INFECTION AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OUTCOMES.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes for Infections Following Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at Hanoi Medical University Hospital.
Subjects and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 18 patients diagnosed with infection after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at Hanoi Medical University Hospital from March 2021 to March 2025.
Results: The study included 18 patients with a mean age of 29.83 ± 9.79 years (range 16–44), with a male-to-female ratio of 5:1. The mean time to symptom onset was 19.41 ± 23 days. Clinically, 100% of patients presented with swelling, warmth, pain, and restricted range of motion. Regarding laboratory findings, both blood tests and synovial fluid analysis demonstrated markedly elevated leukocyte counts exceeding diagnostic thresholds. CRP and ESR levels were also significantly elevated. Medical treatment followed IDSA (2013) and AAOS (2020) recommendations for postoperative septic arthritis, using a combination of Vancomycin with either a third-generation cephalosporin or Clindamycin. The mean duration of antibiotic therapy was 32.94 ± 19.07 days. For surgical management, the graft removal group demonstrated better infection control compared with those treated with arthroscopic debridement alone. Successful graft retention yielded the most favorable functional outcomes (Lysholm 88.5 ± 3.74) and avoided reoperation. Although graft removal effectively controlled infection, 100% of these patients required subsequent reconstructive surgery, particularly in younger and more active individuals. At final follow-up, 100% of patients achieved complete infection resolution after prolonged antibiotic therapy, consistent with IDSA (2013) guidelines.
Conclusion: Postoperative infection following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is uncommon but can lead to serious impairment of knee function. Early diagnosis and aggressive management facilitate graft preservation and favorable recovery.
Article Details
Keywords
Anterior cruciate ligament; Knee arthroscopy; Knee joint infection; Sports injuries.
References
2. Torres-Claramunt R, Gelber P, Pelfort X, et al. Managing septic arthritis after knee ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop. 2016;40(3):607-614. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2884-6
3. Van Tongel A, Stuyck J, Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H. Septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective analysis of incidence, management and outcome. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(7):1059-1063. doi:10.1177/0363546507299443
4. Mustamsir E, Aji AP, Fernando A. The effectiveness of arthroscopic irrigation and debridement in the management of septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2025;59(1):7-17. doi:10.5152/j.aott.2025.24070
5. Barker JU, et al. Risk Factors for Infection After ACL Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis. Published online 2019.
6. Zhang L, Yang R, Mao Y, Fu W. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Risk Factors for an Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023;11(10):23259671231200822. doi:10.1177/23259671231200822
7. Abdelaziz H, Rademacher K, Suero EM, et al. The 2018 International Consensus Meeting Minor Criteria for Chronic Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Validation From a Single Center. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(8):2200-2203. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.014
8. Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, et al. The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(5):1309-1314.e2. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078
9. Schmitz JK, Omar O, Nordkvist A, Hedevik H, Janarv PM, Stålman A. Poorer patient-reported outcome and increased risk of revision at a 5-year follow-up among patients with septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a register-based cohort study of 23,075 primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2023;31(10):4090-4098. doi:10.1007/s00167-023-07498-6
10. Tande DBG, Patel R, Abdel MP, Berbari EF. Microbiology of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections: a database study. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022;28(2):255-259. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2021.06.006
11. Lo Presti M, Costa GG, Grassi A, et al. Graft-Preserving Arthroscopic Debridement With Hardware Removal Is Effective for Septic Arthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Clinical, Arthrometric, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(8):1907-1915. doi:10.1177/0363546520924823
12. Lewis DC, McNamara NE, Tabish EM, et al. Patients treated for infection following ACL reconstruction with graft removal have poorer outcomes than those treated with graft retention: A systematic review. J Exp Orthop. 2025;12(1):e70147. doi:10.1002/jeo2.70147