INTRAOPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS DURING CESAREAN DELIVERY AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS IN WOMEN WITH A PREVIOUS CESAREAN SCAR
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To describe the clinical, paraclinical and intraoperative characteristics, and to evaluate intraoperative blood loss and factors associated with blood loss ≥500 mL in pregnant women undergoing cesarean delivery with a previous cesarean scar.
Subject and method: This analytical cross-sectional study included 402 pregnant women with a previous cesarean scar who underwent cesarean delivery at Can Tho Central General Hospital from July 2024 to January 2026. Blood loss was quantitatively measured using a calibrated collection drape, suctioned volume after subtraction of amniotic fluid and irrigation fluid, and converted surgical gauze weight based on the dry–wet weighing method.
Results: The mean maternal age was 31.16 ± 5.61 years. Most women had one previous cesarean delivery (71.64%) and an interdelivery interval >24 months (85.57%). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 402.94 ± 143.28 mL. Blood loss of 500–<1000 mL accounted for 15.42%, while blood loss ≥1000 mL accounted for 0.75%. After adjustment, maternal age ≥35 years, preoperative anemia, pelvic adhesions, abnormal placentation, uterine fibroids and estimated fetal weight ≥3500 g were associated with blood loss ≥500 mL.
Conclusion: Intraoperative blood loss during cesarean delivery in pregnant women with a previous cesarean scar was predominantly <500 mL. Maternal age ≥35 years, preoperative anemia and estimated fetal weight ≥3500 g should be considered before surgery. Intraoperatively, pelvic adhesions, abnormal placentation and concomitant uterine fibroids should be carefully assessed when evaluating the risk of increased blood loss in this population.
Article Details
Keywords
cesarean delivery, previous cesarean scar, intraoperative blood loss, associated factors.
References
[2] Meier M, Ilkhanipur A, Mallmann P, Lampe B. Maternal Outcome in Pregnant Women Undergoing Third Caesarean Section After Onset of Labor. In vivo (Athens, Greece). 2024;38(6):2718-28. doi:10.21873/invivo.13750.
[3] Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ global health. 2021;6(6). doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671.
[4] Shteynman L, Monanian G, Torres G, Sabetta G, Li DM, Jin Z, et al. Pathophysiology and Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Journal of developmental biology. 2025;13(4). doi:10.3390/jdb13040045.
[5] Hu H, Wang L, Gao J, Chen Z, Chen X, Tang P, et al. Risk factors of severe postpartum hemorrhage in pregnant women with placenta previa or low-lying placenta: a retrospective cohort study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2024;24(1):674. doi:10.1186/s12884-024-06876-3.
[6] Lê Hoàng Quyên, Nguyễn Tấn Hưng, Đỗ Thị Minh Nguyệt, Đoàn Thanh Điền, Quan Kim Phụng, Nguyễn Thị Thư, et al. Lượng máu mất và các yếu tố liên quan trong sinh mổ của phụ nữ bị nhau thai tiền đạo tại Bệnh viện Phụ sản Cần Thơ năm 2022-2024. Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ. 2024(77):220-6. doi:10.58490/ctump.2024i77.2704.
[7] Gari A, Hussein K, Daghestani M, Aljuhani S, Bukhari M, Alqahtani A, et al. Estimating blood loss during cesarean delivery: A comparison of methods. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. 2022;17(5):732-6. doi:10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.03.004.
[8] Lê Thị Thu Hà. Khảo sát tính an toàn và khả thi của bóc u xơ tử cung to trong khi mổ lấy thai. Y Học TP Hồ Chí Minh. 2016;20(1):334-40. Link: https://tapchiyhoctphcm.vn/articles/14033.
[9] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 7: Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2018;132(6):e259-e75. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002983.
[10] Harvey SA. Postpartum Hemorrhage. JAMA. 2025;334(22):2031-2. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.16352.