RESEARCH FOR CLINICAL AND PARACLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME CASES OF CESAREAN SECTION SCAR DEFECT WITH INFERTILITY AT THE NATIONAL HOSPITAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the clinical and paraclinical characteristics of patients with cesarean
section scar defects
Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study of 63 patients who attended the
National Center for Reproductive Medicine, National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, from
August 2020 to March 2021. Describe abnormal clinical symptoms of menstruation after cesarean
section and characteristics of surgical scar defects through transvaginal ultrasound.
Results: The rate of abnormal menstrual bleeding after cesarean section was 74,6%. The rate of
abnormal menstrual symptoms, mainly prolonged vaginal bleeding after menstruation, was 53,2%,
menorrhagia was 55,3%, dysmenorrhea was 31,9%, pelvic pain was 59, 6%. Scar defect was seen
mainly on the uterus in the posterior position, the morphology had 1 branch. The average length,
width and depth of scar were 5,8 ± 2,4 mm, 11,2 ± 4,7 mm, and 4,8 ± 2,0 mm, respectively. The
average thickness of the remaining uterine muscle was 4,1 ± 1,6mm (from 1,0mm to 8,3mm). The
scar defect size was larger in the group with symptoms of prolonged bleeding after menses and
menorrhagia with p < 0,05.
Conclusion: Patients with cesarean scar defects had abnormal menstrual rates over 50%. Scar
defects were mainly seen on the uterus in the retrograde position, the shape of a single-branch
defect, the size of the scar defect was related to the severity of the clinical manifestations.
Article Details
Keywords
Cesarean section scar defect, cesarean section.
References
một số yếu tố liên quan đến chỉ định mổ lấy
thai tại BVBMTSS năm 1997. Trường Đại học
Y Hà Nội: Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; 1998.
2. Phạm Thu Xanh, Nhận xét tình hình sản
phụ có sẹo mổ cũ được xử trí tại BVPSTW
trong hai năm 1995 và 2005: Đại học Y Hà
Nội; 2006.
3. Lê Hoài Chương, Mai Trọng Dũng,
Nguyễn Đức Thắng, Đoàn Thị Thu Trang,
Nhận xét thực trạng mổ lấy thai tại Bệnh viện
Phụ sản Trung ương năm 2017. Tạp chí Phụ
Sản, 2017;16(1):92-6.
4. Jordans IPM, de Leeuw RA, Stegwee SI,
Sonographic examination of uterine niche in
non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi
procedure. 2019;53(1):107-15.
5. Thurmond AS, Harvey WJ, Smith SA,
Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal
vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by
sonohysterography. Journal of Ultrasound in
Medicine. 1999;18(1):13-6.
6. Bij de Vaate AJ, Brolmann HA, van der
Voet LF et al., Ultrasound evaluation of the
Cesarean scar: relation between a niche and
postmenstrual spotting. Ultrasound in obstetrics
& gynecology : the official journal of the
International Society of Ultrasound in
Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;37(1):93-9.
7. Fabres C, Surgical treatment and followup of women with intermenstrual bleeding due
to cesarean section scar defect. Journal of
minimally invasive gynecology.
2005;12(1):25-8.
8. Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY et al.,
Cesarean scar defect: correlation between
Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical
symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound in
obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of
the International Society of Ultrasound in
Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;34(1):85-9.
9. Thuỳ NB, Bước đầu đánh giá soi buồng
tử cung sửa khuyết sẹo mổ lấy thai trên bệnh
nhân rong kinh rong huyết tại Bệnh viện Phụ
sản Hà Nội. Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội: Trường
Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2019.
10. Risager JK, Uldbjerg N, Glavind J,
Cesarean scar thickness in non-pregnant
women as a risk factor for uterine rupture. The
journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine :
the official journal of the European Association
of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia
and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the
International Society of Perinatal Obstet.
2020:1-6.
11. Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L,
High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section
scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination.
Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the
official journal of the International Society of
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
2009;34(1):90-7.