THICKNESS OF THE MAXILLARY SINUS LATERAL WALL ON CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN VIETNAMESE ADULTS

Le Thi Huong1, Le Duc Lanh2, Ho Huu Tien3, Tran Thi Anh Thu3, Tran Thi Dang Ngoc3, Vu Quang Hoa3, Huynh Xuan Truc4, Nguyen Thi Uyen Trang5
1 Faculty of Dentistry, Nguyen Tat Thanh University
2 Faculty of Dentistry, Hong Bang International University
3 National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology, Ho Chi Minh city
4 Huynh Truc Dental Clinic
5 Mat Troi Dental Clinic

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the thickness of the maxillary sinus lateral wall on cone-beam computed tomography in Vietnamese adults according to sex, side, and tooth region, and to assess its relationship with age and the diameter of the posterior superior alveolar artery.


Materials and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 200 cone beam computed tomography scans (400 maxillary sinuses) of patients aged 18-65 years. Maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness was measured at 3 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm above the sinus floor at posterior maxillary tooth regions (first and second premolars, first and second molars). Differences according to sex, side, and tooth region were analyzed, and correlations with age and posterior superior alveolar artery diameter were assessed.


Results: The mean maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness at 3 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm above the sinus floor was 1.67 ± 0.46 mm, 1.25 ± 0.36 mm, and 1.38 ± 0.45 mm, respectively, with the thinnest wall observed at the 10-mm level. Maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness was generally greater in males than in females, with statistically significant differences at premolar and second molar regions (p < 0.05), while no significant difference was observed at the first molar region. Significant differences in maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness were found among tooth regions (p < 0.05), with the thinnest wall at the premolar area. No significant correlation was observed between maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness and age (p > 0.05). A weak positive correlation between maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness and posterior superior alveolar artery diameter was detected at the 3-mm level (r = 0.331; p < 0.05), but not at the 10-mm or 15-mm levels.


Conclusion: The maxillary sinus lateral wall in Vietnamese adults is relatively thin, particularly in the premolar region, which is commonly selected for lateral window sinus floor elevation. The relationship between maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness and the posterior superior alveolar artery is evident only near the sinus floor. Preoperative cone beam computed tomography assessment of the lateral wall and related vascular structures is essential to minimize surgical complications.

Article Details

References

[1] Yang H.M et al. The buccofacial wall of maxillary sinus: an anatomical consideration for sinus augmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2009, 11 (suppl 1): e2-e6. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00138.x
[2] Yang S.M et al. Computed tomographic assessment of maxillary sinus wall thickness in edentulous patients. J Oral Rehabil, 2012, 39 (6): 421-428. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02295.x
[3] Li J et al. A study of maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness of Han population in Jiangsu region using cone-beam computed tomographic. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2013, 22 (5): 537-541.
[4] Khajehahmadi S et al. Association between the lateral wall thickness of the maxillary sinus and the dental status: cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Iran J Radiol, 2014, 11 (1): e6675. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.6675
[5] Monje A et al. Are short dental implants (< 10 mm) effective? A meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials. J Periodontol, 2013, 84 (7): 895-904. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120328
[6] Kang S.J et al. Anatomical structures in the maxillary sinus related to lateral sinus elevation: a cone beam computed tomographic analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013, 24 (suppl A100): 75-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02378.x
[7] Yildirim T.T et al. The relationship between maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness, alveolar bone loss, and demographic variables: a cross-sectional cone-beam computerized tomography study. Med Princ Pract, 2019, 28 (2): 109-114. doi: 10.1159/000494325
[8] Morgan N et al. Cone beam computed tomographic for diagnostics, treatment planning and monitoring of sinus floor elevation procedures. Diagnostics (Basel), 2023, 13 (10): 1684. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101684.