16. EVALUATION OUTCOMES OF ABMS APPROACH IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASY

Le Dinh Khoa1, Ho Van Duy An1, Tran Ngoc Chon1, Nguyen Van On1
1 Tam Anh General Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty by ABMS approach has been shown to be an effective, safe and minimal invasive surgery which has faster recovery and reduces complication and dislocation rate.


Material and Methods: A prospective review of 44 total hip replacement cases by ABMS approach at Tam Anh HCM hospital from May 2023 to February 2024 with at least 6 months follow-up.


Results: Mean surgical time was 77.12 ± 17.82 minutes, mean incision length was 8.65 ± 1.87 cm, mean blood loss was 269.51 ± 85.78 ml with decrease of Hgb post operation was 1.86 ± 0.89 g/dL, 01 blood transfusion case (2.27%). Harris hip score pre-operative, 3 months and 6 months post-operative are 43.5 ± 6.8, 83.5 ± 2.8 and 91.1 ± 3.8, 02 cases had trochanteric fracture intra-operative (4.54%).


Conclusion: Total hip arthroplasty with ABMS approach has been shown to be a safe and effective surgical approach with fast recovery, lower blood loss, lower complication and dislocation rate. This approach can be easily performed with normal surgical table and suitable with variable prothesis designs without special instruments needed.

Article Details

References

[1] Learmonth, I.D., C. Young, and C. Rorabeck, The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet, 2007. 370(9597): p. 1508-19.
[2] Malik, A. and L.D. Dorr, The science of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007. 463: p. 74-84.
[3] Berger, R.A., et al., Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004(429): p. 239-47.
[4] Oinuma, K., et al., Total hip arthroplasty by a minimally invasive, direct anterior approach. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2007. 19(3): p. 310-26.
[5] Spaans, A.J., J.A. van den Hout, and S.B. Bolder, High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by
the direct anterior approach. Acta Orthop, 2012. 83(4): p. 342-6.
[6] Christensen, C.P., T. Karthikeyan, and C.A. Jacobs, Greater prevalence of wound complications requiring reoperation with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2014. 29(9): p. 1839-41.
[7] Sibia, U.S., et al., The Impact of Surgical Technique on Patient Reported Outcome Measures and Early Complications After Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2017. 32(4): p. 1171-1175.
[8] Lei, P., et al., Assessment of the Learning Curve of Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty in an Asian Population. Biomed Res Int, 2020. 2020: p. 5180458.
[9] Flevas, D.A., et al., The Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip (SuperPATH) Approach Revisited: Technique Improvements after the Perioperative Experience of 344 Cases. Life (Basel), 2022. 12(7).
[10] Bertin, K.C. and H. Röttinger, Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004(429): p. 248-55.
[11] Kagan, R.P., et al., Advantages of an Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach in Transitioning From a Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Minimizing the Learning Curve. J Arthroplasty, 2019. 34(12): p. 2962-2967.
[12] Civinini, R., et al., The anterior-based muscle-sparing approach to the hip: the "other" anterior approach to the hip. Int Orthop, 2019. 43(1): p. 47-53.
[13] Rana, A.J., et al., The ABLE Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach: A Safe and Effective Option for Total Hip Arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today, 2022. 16: p. 264-269.e1.
[14] Lewinnek, G.E., et al., Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1978. 60(2): p. 217-20.
[15] Unis, D.B., et al., Postoperative changes in the tensor fascia lata muscle after using the modified anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2013. 28(4): p. 663-5.
[16] Ince, A., et al., Minimally invasive anterolateral approach to the hip: Risk to the superior gluteal nerve. Acta Orthopaedica, 2007. 78(1): p. 86-89.