SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF UTERINE FIBROID ENUCLEATION AT THE NATIONAL HOSPITAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY

Vu Van Du1,2, Nguyen Ba Thiet1, Le Thi Ngoc Huong1, Le Thanh Tung1,2
1 National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecolog
2 VNU University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical, paraclinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of uterine fibroid myomectomy at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Materials and methods: A prospective cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 244 patients diagnosed with uterine fibroids, indicated for and undergoing myomectomy at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology from June 2025 to November 2025.


Results: The mean age was 37.9 ± 5.8 years. Surgical approaches included open surgery (61.1%), laparoscopic surgery (29.9%), and hysteroscopic surgery (6.6%). Most patients had single fibroids (79.5%) with a mean largest diameter of 67.3 ± 24.1 mm; intramural and subserosal types accounted for 36.5% and 17.2%. Uterine size and tumor diameter ≥ 80 mm were risk factors for choosing open surgery (OR = 3.06; p < 0.05), while subserosal fibroids significantly reduced this likelihood (OR = 0.21; p < 0.001). The rates of uterine cavity entry (9.4%) and postoperative fever (8.6%) were higher in the open surgery group (p < 0.05). Blood transfusion rates were low (4.5% in total) and not significantly different between groups. The mean hospital stay was 4.1 ± 0.6 days.


Conclusion: Fibroid location and size are the main factors influencing surgical approach selection. All surgical methods were safe with low complication rates.

Article Details

References

[1] Stewart EA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Catherino WH, Lalitkumar S, Gupta D, Vollenhoven B. Uterine fibroids. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16043. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.43.
[2] Sundermann AC, Aldridge TD, Hartmann KE, Jones SH, Torstenson ES, Edwards DRV. Uterine fibroids and risk of preterm birth by clinical subtypes: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):560. doi:10.1186/s12884-021-03968-2.
[3] Dolmans MM, Donnez J, Fellah L. Uterine fibroid management: Today and tomorrow. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(7):1222-1229. doi:10.1111/jog.14002.
[4] Hồ Thị Phương Mai, Hồ Thị Thu Hằng , Trần Khánh Nga , et al.Đánh giá kết quả điều trị u xơ cơ tử cung bằng phẫu thuật nội soi tại Bệnh viện đa khoa tỉnh Bình Dương. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2025/07/10 2025;551(3)doi:10.51298/vmj.v551i3.14686.
[5] Nguyễn Thanh Xuân , Đinh Thị Minh Phương , Nguyễn Văn Tuấn Anh ,et al. Đánh giá kết quả của phương pháp phẫu thuật nội soi bóc u xơ cơ tử cung tại Bệnh viện Trung ương Huế. Tạp chí Y Dược Huế. 2025/4/24 2025;15(1):144-151. doi:10.34071/jmp.2025.1.20.
[6] Đào Thị Hồng Nhung , Trần Quang Tuấn. Kết quả điều trị bệnh lý u xơ cơ tử cung bằng phẫu thuật tại Bệnh viện Phụ sản Nam Định. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 07/14 2024;540(2)doi:10.51298/vmj.v540i2.10340.
[7] Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Uterine fibroid management: from the present to the future. Hum Reprod Update. Nov 2016;22(6):665-686. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmw023.
[8] Baird DD, Dunson DB, Hill MC, Cousins D, Schectman JM. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan 2003;188(1):100-7. doi:10.1067/mob.2003.99.
[9] Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Fraser IS. The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Dec 2018;143(3):393-408. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12666.
[10] Dương Đức Thắng , Nguyễn Tuấn Minh , Đặng Thị Minh Nguyệt . Phẫu thuật bóc u xơ cơ tử cung tại Bệnh viện Phụ sản Trung ương. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2023;522(1):18-22.
[11] Tinelli A, Pecorella G, Panese G, et al. Biologically-Based Notions About Uterine Bleeding During Myomectomy: Reasoning on Tradition and New Concepts. Med Sci (Basel). Jun 1 2025;13(2)doi:10.3390/medsci13020068.
[12] Hadisaputra W, Pratama AA. How to manage multiple fibroids in reproductive laparoscopic surgery. Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy. 2013/11/01/ 2013;2(4):110-113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gmit.2013.07.004.
[13] Hupet R, Balestra A, Gillet E, et al. Old- versus New-School: Laparoscopy versus Laparotomy in Complex and Multiple Myomectomies. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6314972/v1.
[14] Saridogan E, Antoun L, Bouwsma EVA, et al. European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) Good Practice Recommendations on surgical techniques for removal of fibroids: part 1 abdominal (laparoscopic and open) myomectomy. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. Sep 2024;16(3):263-280. doi:10.52054/fvvo.16.3.041.
[15] Varlı B, Baydemir ŞK, Şükür YE, Berker B. Laparoscopic myomectomy is safe in patients with previous abdominal surgery. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine. October 2023;6(6):1411-1415. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1363658.