EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERVENTIONS FOR AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS USING A MULTIDISCIPLINARY MODEL AT DANANG REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary intervention model in the treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) at Da Nang City Rehabilitation Hospital.
Methods: This non-controlled clinical intervention study used a pre–post design in 79 children aged 16 months to 5 years diagnosed with ASD according to DSM-5 criteria. The interventions included speech therapy, occupational therapy, clinical psychology, physical therapy, special education, and family involvement, with a minimum of 20 hours per week for 6 months. Outcomes were assessed using the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) and the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) before and after intervention.
Results: After six months, 73.4% of participants achieved at least minimal clinical improvement. The proportion of children classified with severe ASD decreased from 22.8% to 3.8% (p < 0.05). The mean CARS score decreased from 33.9 ± 4.9 to 30.3 ± 3.0, and the mean ATEC score decreased from 84.2 to 60.0 (p < 0.05). All ATEC subscales improved, with the most significant changes in social functioning and language–communication.
Conclusion: The multidisciplinary intervention model produced significant improvements in behavior, language, and social functioning among children with ASD. This model represents a comprehensive, feasible, and context-appropriate approach for hospital-based rehabilitation.
Chi tiết bài viết
Từ khóa
Autism Spectrum Disorder, CARS, ATEC, rehabilitation
Tài liệu tham khảo
[2] T. Hirota and B. H. King, 2023, Autism spectrum disorder: a review, Jama, vol. 329, no. 2, pp. 157–168.
[3] R. J. Landa, 2018, Efficacy of early interventions for infants and young children with, and at risk for, autism spectrum disorders, International Review of Psychiatry, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 25–39.
[4] S. H. Dalwai, D. K. Modak, A. P. Bondre, S. Ansari, D. Siddiqui, and D. Gajria, 2017, Effect of multidisciplinary intervention on clinical outcomes of children with autism spectrum disorder in Mumbai, India, Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 95–116.
[5] A. Y. Hardan et al., 2015, A randomized controlled trial of Pivotal Response Treatment Group for parents of children with autism, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 884–892, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12354.
[6] L. Jurek et al., 2022, Response (minimum clinically relevant change) in ASD symptoms after an intervention according to CARS-2: consensus from an expert elicitation procedure, European child & adolescent psychiatry, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1–10.
[7] B. Lee, S. Park, H. J. Kwon, G. S. Hwang, and M. Kim, 2023, Integrative treatment program for the treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder: A prospective observational case series, Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 13, p. 1017005.
[8] P. Khawash and A. Chatterjee, 2025, Childhood Autism Rating Scale-as a Tool for Monitoring Response and Intervention Efficacy in Core Symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorder, Indian Journal of Behavioural Sciences, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 80–84.
[9] T. Đ. Nguyễn, V. T. Võ, N. K. Lương, T. Q. V. Nguyễn, T. Đặng, and T. X. D. Nguyễn, 2021, Tỷ lệ trẻ mắc rối loạn phổ tự kỷ và kết quả bước đầu can thiệp phục hồi chức năng dựa vào cộng đồng tại tỉnh Quảng Ngãi, Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, vol. 505, no. 1.
[10] T. T. Thắng, T. T. Kiều, B. Y. Linh, D. T. T. Vy, P. V. Đông, and N. V. Tuấn, 2024, Kết quả can thiệp trẻ rối loạn phổ tự kỷ nặng tại Bệnh viện nhi đồng Cần Thơ, Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ, no. 81, pp. 101–108.