26. OUTCOMES OF SECONDARY GINGIVOPERIOSTEOPLASTY FOR THE TREATMENT OF UNILATERAL ALVEOLAR CLEFTS

Tran Thi Minh Thu1, Nguyen Duc Khai2, Lam Hoai Phuong3, Ho Nguyen Thanh Chon1,2, Dang Hoang Thom4,5, Duong Huy Luong5,6
1 University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
2 University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City
3 My Thien Hospital
4 National Children’s Hospital
5 Hanoi Medical University
6 Ministry of Health

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to describe the clinical and CBCT outcomes of secondary gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) for the treatment of unilateral alveolar clefts.


 


Subject and method: Descriptive and prospective study collected data from 28 patients with unilateral alveolar clefts who were clinically monitored before and after the surgery 1 day, 1 month, 6 months and CBCT scans before and after the surgery 6 months.


 


Results: The mean age was 5.7 ± 0.9 years, of which 18 (64.3%) patients were male, 20 (71.4%) patients had left-sided alveolar cleft, 18 (64.3%) patients had alveolar cleft involving the complete cleft palate and 16 (57.1%) patients had a tooth in the cleft. The median time of surgery was 41.5 minutes and the interquartile range was 37 minutes - 53 minutes. After 6 months of the surgery, 100% of patients scored 5 or higher corresponding to the categories of fair, good and very good in terms of clinical aspects, with a 225.9 ± 36.0 mm3 reduction in alveolar cleft volume and 32.1% of patients had a bone bridge across the cleft.


 


Conclusion: GPP for the treatment of unilateral alveolar cleft patients aged 5-7 years old initially showed good results clinically and on CBCT.

Article Details

References

[1] Võ Ngọc Cường, Phan Minh Hoàng, Đỗ Tiến Hải và cộng sự. Đặc điểm lâm sàng bệnh nhân khe hở xương ổ răng điều trị ghép xương có sử dụng fibrin. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 08/25 2023;529(1).
[2] Chu YY, Chang FC, Lu TC, Lee CH, Chen PK. Surgical Outcomes of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting and Extensive Gingivoperiosteoplasty Performed at Mixed Dentition Stage in Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate. J Clin Med. Feb 20 2020;9(2).
[3] Meazzini MC, Corno M, Novelli G, et al. Long-Term Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Formation in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate after Early Secondary Gingivoalveoloplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016;137(2):365e-374e.
[4] Peamkaroonrath C, Godfrey K, Chatrchaiwiwatana S. New clinical method for alveolar bone graft evaluation in cleft patients: a pilot study. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal. 2011;48(3):286-292.
[5] Stasiak M, Wojtaszek-Slominska A, Racka-Pilszak B. A novel method for alveolar bone grafting assessment in cleft lip and palate patients: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. Apr 2021;25(4):1967-1975. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03505-z.
[6] Skoog T. The use of periosteum and Surgicel for bone restoration in congenital clefts of the maxilla. A clinical report and experimental investigation. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1967;1(2):113-30.
[7] Wang YC, Liao YF, Chen PK. Comparative Outcomes of Primary Gingivoperiosteoplasty and Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 2016;137(1):218-227.
[8] Wang YC, Lu TC, Chen YA, Chen PK, Liao YF. Outcomes of alveolar cleft repair in complete cleft lip and palate after tertiary gingivoperiosteoplasty and segmental Le Fort I osteotomy. Clin Oral Investig. Aug 2023;27(8):4643-4652.