34. EVALUATION OF SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF FLEXOR TENDON REPAIR IN ZONE II OF THE HAND AT THE HOSPITAL FOR TRAUMATOLOGY AND ORTHOPAEDICS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Injuries resulting in flexor tendon lacerations in the upper limb are common. The flexor tendons in the hand are anatomically divided into 5 zones, each requiring different surgical approaches for tendon repair. Zone 2 injuries, in particular, pose challenges in repair techniques due to higher rates of tendon adhesion complications. Achieving secure tendon repair in Zone 2 to facilitate early active mobilization and minimize adhesion complications presents a treatment challenge.
Objective: The aim is to evaluate and compare the outcomes of surgical repair for Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries in the hand, as well as the re-rupture complication rates, between the two-strand core suture technique (Group A) combined with early passive motion exercises and the four-strand core suture technique (Group B) combined with early active motion exercises.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 58 patients (comprising 88 fingers) with Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries who underwent primary tendon repair at the Hospital for Traumatology and Orthopedics in Ho Chi Minh City from January 2021 to June 2023. Group A consisted of 28 patients (45 fingers) with two-strand core sutures, while Group B consisted of 30 patients (43 fingers) with four-strand core sutures. Treatment outcomes were assessed based on grip strength, total active range of motion (TAM) of the fingers, surgical duration, and re-rupture rates. Results: Group B (four-strand core suture) demonstrated superior restoration of finger motion compared to Group A (two-strand core suture) with a significant difference (P = 0.038). There was no significant difference in grip strength between the two groups (P = 0.16). The re-rupture rate was 2.3% in Group B compared to 11,1% in Group A.
Conclusion: Four-strand core suture repair for Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries in the hand facilitates early active mobilization, resulting in significantly improved joint motion recovery compared to the two-strand technique. Additionally, the re-rupture rate is lower with the four-strand technique.
Article Details
Keywords
Core suture technique, hand surgery, Zone 2 flexor tendon.
References
operative hand surgery e-book. Elsevier Health
Sciences, 2021.
[2] KL Silfverskiöld, EJ May, AH Törnvall, Flexor
digitorum profundus tendon excursions during
controlled motion after flexor tendon repair in
zone II: a prospective clinical study. J Hand Surg
Am, 1992. 17(1): p. 122-131.
[3] Alice W, Sascha TB, Brigitte V et al., Fourstrand
core suture improves flexor tendon repair
compared to two-strand technique in a rabbit
model, Biomed Res Int, 2016.
[4] MD Shaieb, DI Singer, Tensile strengths of
various suture techniques. J Hand Surg Br, 1997,
22(6): p. 764-767.
[5] JW Strickland, Development of flexor tendon
surgery: twenty-five years of progress. J Hand
Surg Am, 2000, 25(2): p. 214-235.
[6] Pang L, Tong DL, Early Active Mobilization
Rehabilitation Protocol After Flexor Tendon
Repair in Zone II of the Hand: A Systematic
Review. 2016, Hand 11(1_suppl): p. 145S-145S.
[7] Phạm Thị Thanh Hiền, Nguyễn Vũ Hoàng,
Nguyễn Thanh Tùng, Đánh giá kết quả phẫu
thuật khâu nối kỳ đầu gân gấp vùng II trong điều
trị vết thương bàn tay tại Bệnh viện trung ương
Thái Nguyên; Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 2022,
508(2).
[8] Ahmed FS, Aasem MN, Ahmed NE et al.,
Fourstrands versus six-strands core sutures technique
for surgical management of acute zone II flexor
tendon injury; J Minia Journal of Medical
Research; 2020, 31(3): p. 291-297.
[9] Ahmed FS , Flexor digitorum profundus with
or without flexor digitorum superficialis tendon
repair in acute Zone 2B injuries; J Hand Surg
Eur, 2020, 45(10): p. 1034-1044.
[10] Chunfeng Z, Peter CA, Mark EZ et al., Resection
of the flexor digitorum superficialis reduces
gliding resistance after zone II flexor digitorum
profundus repair in vitro. J Hand Surg Am, 2002,
27(2): p. 316-321.
[11] Phạm Đình Ngân Thanh, Đánh giá hiệu quả
gập thụ động sớm theo nguyên tắc Kleinert và
Dunran sau khâu nối gân gập các ngón tay dài;
Luận văn Tốt nghiệp Bác sĩ Nội trú Đại học Y
Dược thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Tp Hồ Chí Minh,
2009.
[12] Nguyễn Quốc Thắng, Đánh giá kết quả điều trị đứt
gân gấp ngón II, III, IV, V bàn tay bằng phương
pháp khâu strickland; Luận văn tốt nghiệp Bác
sĩ Chuyên khoa II, Đại học Y khoa Phạm Ngọc
Thạch thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 2022.
[13] Khương Thiện Nhơn, Đánh giá kết quả điều trị
đứt gân gấp vùng II các ngón tay dài bằng phương
pháp khâu 4 sợi trục; Luận văn tốt nghiệp Bác
sĩ Chuyên khoa II, Đại học Y khoa Phạm Ngọc
Thạch thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 2014.
[14] Maryam F, Fereydoun L, Ali A et al., A
prospective randomized controlled trial of
controlled passive mobilization vs. place and
active hold exercises after zone 2 flexor tendon279
repair. Hand Surg, 2014, 19(01): p. 53-59.
[15] G L Hoffmann, U Büchler, E Vögelin, Vögelin,
Clinical results of flexor tendon repair in zone
II using a six-strand double-loop technique
compared with a two-strand technique; J Hand
Surg Eur Vol. 2008 Aug;33(4):418-23.
[16] J O Small, M D Brennen, J Colville, Early active
mobilisation following flexor tendon repair in
zone 2; J Hand Surg Br, 1989, 14(4): p. 383-391.
[17] P T Ali Kitis, Nihal Buker, Inci Gokalan Kara,
Comparison of two methods of controlled
mobilisation of repaired flexor tendons in zone
2, Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg,
2009; 43(3):160-5.
[18] Sandow M, M.J.A.H.C. McMahon, Singlecross
grasp six-strand repair for acute flexor
tenorrhaphy: modified Savage technique. 1996,
1(01): p. 41-64.
[19] Linda K, Early active motion flexor tendon
protocol using one splint. J Hand Ther, 2003,
16(3): p. 199-206.