Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2024-03-12
Abstract Views: 112
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 73
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v65iCD1.977
Issue
Vol. 65 No. CĐ 1 - Liên chi hội Phẫu thuật bàn tay
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Thanh, P. Đình N. ., An, P. L. ., Wallace, S. J. ., & Hoàng, T. N. B. M. . (2024). 17. SURVEY CAREGIVERS’ OPINIONS ON THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE APHASIA UNITED BEST PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS IN VIETNAM. Vietnam Journal of Community Medicine, 65(CĐ 1 - Liên chi hội Phẫu thuật bàn tay). https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v65iCD1.977

17. SURVEY CAREGIVERS' OPINIONS ON THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE APHASIA UNITED BEST PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS IN VIETNAM

Pham Dinh Ngan Thanh1, Pham Le An1, Sarah J Wallace2, Tran Nguyen Binh Minh Hoang3
1 University of Medicine & Pharmacy HCMC
2 The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
3 HCMC Hospital for Rehabilitation and Professional Diseases

Main Article Content

Abstract

Aphasia affects the quality of life of patients and their caregivers.


Objective: To determine (1) the appropriateness of the content of the best practice recommendations (PR) for aphasia of Aphasia United from the caregivers’ perspective in Vietnam; and (2) PRs that need to be supplemented in accordance with reality in Vietnam.


Method: Quantitative combined qualitative method using nominal group technique and maximum variation sampling.


Results: Seventeen caregivers for post-stroke aphasia patients participated in one of six nominal groups. Most of the existing PRs have a high agreement rate (88.24 – 100%). Priority PRs for supplementation are compiled into five themes and ordered by relative importance. The top priority recommendation is “People with aphasia and caregivers should receive psychological support” (42.16%); next is “People with aphasia should have easy access to Speech and Language Therapy” (34.31%).


Conclusion: Existing recommendations are appropriate to the needs of people with aphasia and related people in the Vietnamese context from the caregiver’s perspective. Besides, additional recommendations contribute to improving service quality for aphasia.

Article Details

Keywords

Aphasia, Caregivers, Practice recommendation, Speech and Language Therapy, Stroke, Nominal group technique.

References

[1] Papathanasiou I, Coppens P, Aphasia and related
neurogenic communication disorders: basic
concepts, management, and efficacy. Burlington,
MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2017.
[2] Simmons-Mackie N, Worrall L et al., The top
ten: best practice recommendations for aphasia.
Aphasiology. 2016; 31:1-21.
[3] Aphasia United, Khuyến nghị thực hành tốt nhất
cho Mất ngôn ngữ 2014, www.aphasiatrials.
org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/AphasiaUnited-
BPR-Vietnamese.pdf. Ngày truy cập lại:
25/10/2023
[4] Bộ Y tế, Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán, điều trị phục hồi
chức năng cho người bệnh đột quỵ (Quyết định
số 2536/QĐ-BYT ngày 16 tháng 06 năm 2020).
Hà Nội, 2020.
[5] Wallace SJ, Worrall L et al., Which outcomes
are most important to people with aphasia and
their families? An international nominal group
technique study framed within the ICF. Disability
Rehabilitation. 2017; 39(14):1364-79.144
[6] Elo S, Kyngäs H, The qualitative content
analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing.
2008; 62(1):107-15.
[7] McMillan SS, Kelly F et al., Using the Nominal
Group Technique: how to analyse across multiple
groups. Health Services and Outcomes Research
Methodology. 2014; 14(3):92-108.
[8] United States Agency for International
Development, Đánh giá tính sẵn có dịch vụ âm
ngữ và ngôn ngữ trị liệu tại Việt Nam 29/08/2016
– 30/09/2016, 2016.
[9] Nguyen HT, Gall S et al., Processes of Stroke
Unit Care and Outcomes at Discharge in
Vietnam: Findings from the Registry of Stroke
Care Quality (RES-Q) in a Major Public Hospital.
Journal of Stroke Medicine. 2019; 2(2):119-27.
[10] Brady MC, Kelly H et al., Speech and
language therapy for aphasia following stroke.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews,
2016; 6.