28. VALUE OF STOOL TESTING TECHNIQUES IN DIAGNOSING GASTROINTESTINAL HELMINTH INFECTIONS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: The study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity and explore the convenience, acceptance, and cost of patients for Kato-Katz, Ether-formalin, and direct stool tests in diagnosing gastrointestinal helminths.
Research method: The quantitative study was conducted on 190 stool samples, including positive controls and samples from suspected patients, using Kato-Katz, Ether-formalin, and direct techniques. At the same time, qualitative research directly interviewed patients coming for parasite examination and testing staff and parasite laboratory managers.
Results: As a result, the sensitivity of the three testing techniques is 90.00%, 80.00%, and 70.00%, respectively, and the specificity is 100%. Implementing the Direct Examination technique (100%) in laboratories, but Kato-katz and Ether-formalin techniques are less. The explanation for this problem is that the number of patients per day is too small, it takes time and the procedure is complicated. In comparison, these tests are convenient and reasonably priced for all service providers and recipients of testing services.
Conclusion: The clinical use of stool testing techniques depends mainly on the attitude and acceptance of the user.
Article Details
Keywords
Helminths, stool test, sensitivity, cost.
References
LSG and associates ASM press, Washington
DC, 2007, page 266 - 270
[2] Cổng thông tin Bộ Y tế, Những điều cần biết về
bệnh giun sán và cách phòng chống, Chương
trình mục tiêu quốc gia. https://bom.so/Sb4jCs.
04/05/2019
[3] Benjamin S, Stefanie K, Khalfan AM et al.,
Comparative cost assessment of the Kato-Katz
and FLOTAC techniques for soil-transmitted
helminth diagnosis in epidemiological
surveys, Speich et al., Parasites & Vectors,
Article number: 71, 2010.
[4] Hugo CT, Alison AB, Julia CD et al.,
Considerations for moving beyond the Katokatz
technique parasites as we move towards
elimination, Trends in Parasitology, June 2017,
Vol. 33, No. 6, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
pt.2017.01.007