21. EFFECTIVE PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CLAVICLE FRACTURE BY PLATE FIXATION AT MILITARY HOSPITAL 175
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To estimate the remedial efficacity of prophylactic antibiotic rules in clavicle fracture cases experienced open reduction and plate fixation at Military Hospital 175.
Subjects and methods: A descriptive retrospective study on 147 cases with closed clavicle fractures treated by open reduction and plate fixation at Military Hospital 175 from January 2020 to December 2021. Assessment of ASEPSIS score after surgery.
Results: The effectiveness of the prophylactic antibiotics program enforced at the hospital with the surgical site infection rate after surgery in the group of cases using prophylactic antibiotics and the control group wasn’t statistically significant. In one hundred forty-seven cases, no case had surgical site infection at the time of follow-up examination. In both groups, 100% of patients were discharged with good wound healing according to the ASEPSIS scale. The postoperative hospital stay of the prophylactic antibiotics group was shorter than that of the control group. Profitable effectiveness is shown quite clearly between the two groups. The average cost of antibiotics for a course of surgery in the prophylactic antibiotics group was 76.43 ± 86.87 thousand Vietnam dong, nearly 1/10 of the average cost of antibiotics for a course of treatment for one case in the control group, was 754.64 ± 757.84 thousand Vietnam dong, (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Applying KSDP in surgery to treat clavicle fracture by open reduction and plate fixation is a method to improve treatment efficiency and patient safety.
Article Details
Keywords
Prophylactic antibiotics, clavicle fracture, ASEPSIS.
References
chi phí điều trị và yếu tố nguy cơ của nhiễm
khuẩn vết mổ tại Bệnh viện đa khoa Thống Nhất164
Đồng Nai”, Y học Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, tập
18 (1), 2014, tr. 203-208.
[2] Trần Thị Hương Ngát, Phân tích tình hình sử
dụng kháng sinh trên bệnh nhân phẫu thuật mổ
lấy thai tại Khoa Sản, Bệnh viện Đa khoa khu
vực Cẩm Phả, Luận văn dược sĩ chuyên khoa cấp
I, Trường Đại học Dược Hà Nội, 2020.
[3] Lê Thị Anh Thư, “Những rào cản trong áp dụng
hướng dẫn sử dụng kháng sinh trên bệnh nhân
ngoại khoa tại Bệnh viện Chợ Rẫy”, Y học Thành
phố Hồ Chí Minh, tập 15 (2), 2011, tr. 38-43.
[4] Almasaudi AS, “The relationship between
body mass index and short term postoperative
outcomes in patients undergoing potentially
curative surgery for colorectal cancer: A
systematic review and meta-analysis”, Crit Rev
Oncol Hematol, vol. 121, 2018, pp. 68-73.
[5] Campwala I, “A Comparative Analysis of
Surgical Wound Infection Methods: Predictive
Values of the CDC, ASEPSIS, and Southampton
Scoring Systems in Evaluating Breast
Reconstruction Surgical Site Infections”, Plast
Surg (Oakv), vol. 27 (2), 2019, pp. 93-99.
[6] Cho M, “Underweight body mass index as a
predictive factor for surgical site infections after
laparoscopic appendectomy”, Yonsei Med J,
vol. 55 (6), 2014, pp. 1611-1616.
[7] Kaye KS, “The effect of increasing age on the
risk of surgical site infection”, J Infect Dis, vol.
191 (7), 2005, pp. 1056-1062.
[8] WHO, Antimicrobial resistance: Global report
on surveillance, World Health Organization,
Geneva, 2014.
[9] Wilson AP, “A scoring method (ASEPSIS) for
postoperative wound infections for use in clinical
trials of antibiotic prophylaxis”, Lancet, vol. 1
(8476), 1986, pp. 311-313.