ENDOSCOPE-ASSISTED POSTAURICULAR SURGERY FOR BENIGN PAROTID TUMORS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of endoscope-assisted postauricular surgery for benign parotid tumors.
Methods: This was a literature review study. Search PubMed and ScienceDirect to identify relevant articles, followed by screening, analysis, and synthesis of data to assess the application of endoscope-assisted postauricular parotidectomy for benign tumors.
Conduct a comprehensive review of the thesis. Utilize PubMed and Science Direct databases for the search.
Results: A total of 12 studies published between 2007 and 2026 were included, comprising 7 retrospective and 5 prospective studies. Endoscope-assisted postauricular surgery achieved complete tumor removal with a low recurrence rate. Compared with the conventional open approach, the endoscope-assisted group demonstrated shorter incision length, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and lower or comparable postoperative complication rates, along with superior cosmetic outcomes.
Conclusion: Endoscope-assisted postauricular surgery for benign parotid tumors is a feasible, safe, and effective technique. It provides a minimally invasive alternative that improves cosmetic outcomes and preserves function in appropriately selected patients.
Article Details
Keywords
Postauricular parotidectomy, endoscope-assisted.
References
[2] Li T, Liu Y, Wang Q et al. Parotidectomy by an endoscopic‐assisted postauricular‐groove approach. Head Neck, 2019, 41 (9): 2851-2859. doi: 10.1002/hed.25720
[3] Mu-Kuan Chen, Chang C. Minimally invasive endoscope‐assisted parotidectomy: a new approach. The Laryngoscope, 2007, 117 (11): 1934-1937. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181255ead
[4] Chen J, Chen W, Zhang J et al. Modified endoscope-assisted partial-superficial parotidectomy through a retroauricular incision. ORL, 2014, 76 (3): 121-126. doi: 10.1159/000362605
[5] Zhu J.H, He Z, Zhang L. Endoscope-assisted extracapsular resection of benign parotid tumors via temporal and retroauricular approach. J Craniofac Surg, 2023, 34 (3): 1054-1057. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008525
[6] Huang X, Zheng Y, Liu X et al. A comparison between endoscope‐assisted partial parotidectomy and conventional partial parotidectomy. Otolaryngol Neck Surg, 2009, 140 (1): 70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.09.015
[7] Yan Y, Chen X. Endoscopic resection for benign parotid tumor through a cosmetic retroauricular incision with water sac establishing operative space: a new approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech, 2015, 25 (6): 508-513. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0046
[8] Gao L, Liang Q.L, Ren W.H et al. Comparison of endoscope-assisted versus conventional resection of parotid tumors. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 57 (10): 1003-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.08.010
[9] Chen W.L, Fan S, Zhang D.M. Endoscopically assisted extracapsular dissection of pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland through a postauricular sulcus approach in young patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 55 (4): 400-403. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.01.010
[10] Fan S, Pan G.K, Chen W.L et al. Endoscope-assisted extracapsular dissection of benign parotid tumors through a single cephaloauricular furrow incision versus a conventional approach. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31 (8): 3203-3209. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5345-4
[11. Zhao L, Ye Y, Jiao J et al. Comparison of postoperative cytokine and hormone between endoscopically assisted and open parotid tumor resection. Oral Dis, 2021, 27 (7): 1720-1727. doi: 10.1111/odi.13718