CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLAR EXTRACTION IN CADETS AT THE VIETNAM MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY

Mai Van The1, Lai Trong Bang2, Truong Uyen Cuong3
1 Southern Branch, Vietnam Military Medical University
2 Military Hospital 87
3 Department of Dentistry, Military Hospital 103

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical characteristics, radiographic features, and surgical outcomes of mandibular third molar extraction in cadets at the Vietnam Military Medical University.


Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study with analytical components, combined with a prospective approach, was conducted on 90 patients undergoing surgery at Military Hospital 103. Clinical, radiographic, and postoperative outcome data were collected and analyzed using Stata 15.0 software.


Results: Common symptoms included pain (45.6%), food impaction (30%), and occlusal discrepancy (53.3%), with a high prevalence of gingivitis (90.6%). Radiographically, most third molars were mesioangularly impacted (78.9%), classified as depth A (76.7%), with bifurcated roots (73.3%), and predominantly located away from the inferior alveolar canal (93.4%). The mean surgical difficulty score was 7.0 ± 0.8. Intraoperative complications included root fracture (7.8%) and flap tearing (24.4%), with no severe complications observed. Postoperative outcomes showed marked improvement: 91.1% of cases were rated as good at day 7, and 100% at day 30. Mouth opening progressively increased, and pain scores significantly decreased over time.


Conclusions: In young adults, mandibular third molars are predominantly mesioangularly impacted, presenting relatively high surgical difficulty; however, treatment outcomes are favorable with a low complication rate. Comprehensive preoperative assessment and appropriate surgical techniques are essential for optimizing clinical outcomes

Article Details

References

[1] Shital P, Saloni M, Faizan S et al. Impacted mandibular third molars: a retrospective study of 1198 cases to assess indications for surgical removal, and correlation with age, sex and type of impaction - a single institutional experience. Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2017, 16 (1): 79-84. doi: 10.1007/s12663-016-0929-z
[2] Đinh Thị Thanh Thủy. Tình trạng răng khôn hàm dưới mọc lệch, ngầm ở các dạng hình thái mặt theo chiều trước sau. Tạp chí Y học thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 2018, 2 (22): 55-61.
[3] Susarla S.M, Dodson T.B. Risk factors for third molar extraction difficulty and complications. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics, 2021, 33 (1): 107-118. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.214
[4] Renton T, Hankins M, Sproate C, McGurk M. A randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve as a result of coronectomy and removal of mandibular third molars. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2020, 58 (4): 408-414. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.09.002
[5] Blondeau F, Daniel N.G. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, 2007, 73 (4): 325.
[6] Ali A et al. Complications of mandibular third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2023, 52 (2): 150-162. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2006.11.013
[7] Baqain Z.H, Karaky A.A, Sawair F et al. Frequency estimates and risk factors for postoperative morbidity after third molar removal. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2021, 79 (6): 1214-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.047
[8] Jerjes W, Upile T, Nhembe F et al. Experience versus complication rate in third molar surgery. Head & Face Medicine, 2022, 18 (1): 12-20. doi: 10.1186/1746-160x-2-14