PREDICTION OF HEATING TIME OF CLEAR SINGLE-LAYER TPU ORTHODONTIC ALIGNER TRAYS: AN IN VITRO STUDY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the variation in heating time of single-layer thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) sheets and to develop a predictive model describing the trend of heating time across consecutive thermoforming cycles.
Methods: An in vitro study was conducted on 140 single-layer TPU sheets (Maxflex, 0.76 mm thickness) thermoformed using a Drufomat Scan machine (Dreve, Germany). 7 independent experimental sessions were performed, each consisting of 20 consecutive thermoforming cycles starting from a cold-start condition. Heating time was recorded when the sheet reached a standard sagging depth of 16 mm, measured using a laser monitoring system. Data were analyzed using a non-linear mixed-effects model, Student’s t-test, and Bonferroni multiple comparisons.
Results: The heating time decreased from 113.86 ± 1.57 seconds in the first thermoforming cycle to approximately 69-70 seconds from the 12th cycle onward. Statistically significant differences were observed between cycles 1-11 (p < 0.05), after which the system reached a thermal steady state. The observed heating time was significantly longer than the manufacturer’s recommended 30 seconds (p < 0.001). The non-linear mixed-effects model demonstrated an exponential decay pattern with an asymptotic value of 66.35 seconds (R² = 0.97).
Conclusions: The heating time of single-layer TPU depends on the number of thermoforming cycles and stabilizes after approximately the 12th cycle. The actual heating time was substantially longer than the manufacturer’s recommendation, indicating the need for calibration and standardization of heating parameters under real operating conditions to ensure the accuracy of clear orthodontic aligners.
Article Details
Keywords
Clear orthodontic aligners, thermoforming, heating time, single-layer TPU, nonlinear mixed-effects model.
References
[2] Lombardo L, Arreghini A, Ramina F, Huanca Ghislanzoni L.T, Siciliani G. Optimal parameters for clear aligner therapy: a systematic review. Prog Orthod, 2017, 18: 20. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15317
[3] Sheridan J.J, LeDoux W, McMinn R. Essix retainers: fabrication and supervision for permanent retention. J Clin Orthod, 1993, 27 (1): 37‑45.
[4] Ryokawa H, Miyazaki Y, Fujishima A, Miyazaki T, Maki K. The mechanical properties of dental thermoplastic materials used for clear aligners. Dent Mater J, 2006, 25 (2): 372‑377. doi: 10.1016/j.odw.2006.03.003
[5] Ryu J.H, Kwon J.S, Jiang H.B, Cha J.Y, Kim K.M. Effects of thermoforming on the mechanical and morphological properties of PET‑G aligner materials. Materials, 2021, 14: 7492. doi: 10.3390/polym16020203
[6] Iijima M, Muguruma T, Brantley W.A, Yuasa T, Mizoguchi I. Effect of temperature changes on the mechanical properties of thermoplastic orthodontic materials. Angle Orthod, 2015, 85 (4): 654‑660.
[7] Zhang N, Bai Y, Ding X, Zhang Y. Preparation and characterization of thermoplastic materials for clear aligners. Sci Rep, 2021, 11: 11119. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2011-120
[8] Papadimitriou A, Mousoulea S, Gkantidis N, Kloukos D. Clinical effectiveness of orthodontic aligners: a systematic review. Prog Orthod, 2018, 19: 37. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0235-z
[9] Phạm Ngọc Anh Thư, Trần Thị Bích Vân. Đánh giá thời gian gia nhiệt trong quá trình ép nhiệt vật liệu chỉnh nha trong suốt. Luận văn thạc sĩ chỉnh nha, Đại học Y Dược thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 2025.