AN OVERVIEW OF CRYOPROTECTANTS FOR STEM CELL PRESERVATION
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: This review aims to analyze the mechanisms of cryoinjury, evaluate the functional roles of cryoprotective agents, and systematize emerging strategies to mitigate cryoprotective agents toxicity in stem cell preservation.
Methods: A comprehensive literature synthesis was conducted, focusing on ice crystallization kinetics, the mechanistic pathways of permeating and non-permeating cryoprotective agents, and current optimization protocols for cryopreservation.
Results: Cryopreservation induces cellular damage primarily through intracellular ice formation and osmotic shock. While traditional cryoprotective agents, particularly dimethyl sulfoxide, provide robust protection, their significant cytotoxicity remains a major challenge. Current advancements follow two parallel trajectories: (1) Optimizing traditional protocols by controlling osmotic kinetics, utilizing sugar buffers, and employing low-concentration cryoprotective agents cocktails at reduced exposure temperatures; (2) Developing next-generation biomaterials, including antifreeze proteins, synthetic ice blockers, and biocompatible solutes.
Conclusion: Optimizing cryoprotective agents is critical for maintaining the structural integrity and functional viability of stem cells. Future trends are shifting from high-toxicity single agents toward multi-component synergistic mixtures and biomimetic materials, ensuring maximal safety and efficacy for clinical cell-based therapies.
Article Details
Keywords
Stem cells, cryopreservation, cryoprotective agents (CPAs), cytotoxicity, biomaterials.
References
[2] Spees J.L et al. Mechanisms of mesenchymal stem/stromal cell function. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2016, 7 (1): 125. doi: 10.1186/s13287-016-0363-7.
[3] Crow D. Could iPSCs enable “off-the-shelf” cell therapy? Cell, 2019, 177 (7): 1667-1669. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.043.
[4] Mazur P. Kinetics of water loss from cells at subzero temperatures and the likelihood of intracellular freezing. The Journal of General Physiology, 1963, 47 (2): 347-369. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.2.347.
[5] Talsma H et al. The cryopreservation of liposomes: A differential scanning calorimetry study of the thermal behavior of a liposome dispersion containing mannitol during freezing/thawing. Pharmaceutical Research, 1991, 8 (8): 1021-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1015857008057.
[6] Best B.P. Cryoprotectant toxicity: facts, issues, and questions. Rejuvenation Research, 2015, 18 (5): 422-436. doi: 10.1089/rej.2014.1656.
[7] Gao D et al. Mechanisms of cryoinjury in living cells. ILAR Journal, 2000, 41 (4): 187-196. doi: 10.1093/ilar.41.4.187.
[8] Levin R.L et al. An optimum method for the introduction or removal of permeable cryoprotectants: isolated cells. Cryobiology, 1981, 18 (1): 32-48. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(81)90004-3.
[9] Fahy G.M et al. Cryopreservation of organs by vitrification: perspectives and recent advances. Cryobiology, 2004, 48 (2): 157-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2004.02.002.
[10] Nickell P.K et al. Antifreeze proteins in the primary urine of larvae of the beetle Dendroides canadensis. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2013, 216 (9): 1695-1703. doi: 10.1242/jeb.082461.