LONG-TERM CLINICAL, RADIOGRAPHIC OUTCOMES AND IMPLANT SUCCESS OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT: A 5-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE FOLLOW-UP STUDY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes, as well as the implant success rate, of immediate implant placement after a 5-year follow-up period.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent immediate implant placement following tooth extraction at 108 Military Central Hospital between 2015 and 2021. A total of 112 implants were placed, of which 83 implants in 64 patients were followed for a minimum of 5 years. Gingival–bleeding index, plaque index, probing depth, and marginal bone loss around the implants were periodically assessed from 6 months to 5 years after prosthetic loading in accordance with the Albrektsson success criteria.
Results: Peri-implant soft tissue health was maintained over time, with early improvements in plaque index and probing depth. Marginal bone loss increased gradually over time but remained within physiologically acceptable limits after 5 years. The implant success rate at 5 years was 88.0%, and the implant survival rate was 94,6%.
Conclusion: Immediate implant placement demonstrates favorable long-term outcomes, meets the Albrektsson criteria for implant success, and represents a safe and effective treatment modality in clinical practice.
Article Details
Keywords
immediate implant placement; marginal bone loss; success rate, survival rate.
References
2. Araújo M.G., Silva C.O., Souza A.B., et al. (2019). Socket healing with and without immediate implant placement. Periodontol 2000, 79(1), 168-177.
3. Suzuki J.B. and Bronstein D. (2021). Implant Maintenance: Long-Term Implant Success. Misch’s Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 4th, Elsevier, 1192-1215.
4. Mombelli A., Oosten M.A.C., Schürch E., et al. (1987). The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol, 2(4), 145-151.
5. Schropp L., Kostopoulos L., Wenzel A., et al. (2005). Clinical and radiographic performance of delayed-immediate single-tooth implant placement associated with peri-implant bone defects. A 2-year prospective, controlled, randomized follow-up report. J Clin Periodontol, 32(5), 480-487.
6. Watzak G., Zechner W., Busenlechner D., et al. (2006). Radiological and clinical follow-up of machined- and anodized-surface implants after mean functional loading for 33 months. Clin Oral Implants Res, 17(6), 651-657.
7. Albrektsson T., Zarb G., Worthington P., et al. (1986). The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1(1), 11-25.
8. Trịnh Hồng Mỹ, Nguyễn Tài Sơn, và Tạ Anh Tuấn (2011). Đánh giá sự tiêu xương quanh trụ ghép trong cấy ghép nha khoa có ghép xương. Y học thực hành, 792, 158-160.
9. Bùi Việt Hùng và Tạ Anh Tuấn (2015). Đánh giá kết quả cấy ghép nha khoa nhóm răng trước. Tạp chí Y học thực hành - Bộ Y tế, Số 9 (977), 28-33.
10. Cochran D.L., Nummikoski P.V., Schoolfield J.D., et al. (2009). A prospective multicenter 5-year radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels over time in 596 dental implants placed in 192 patients. J Periodontol, 80(5), 725-733.
11. Hultin M., Gustafsson A., and Klinge B. (2000). Long-term evaluation of osseointegrated dental implants in the treatment of partly edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol, 27(2), 128-133.
12. Botticelli D., Renzi A., Lindhe J., et al. (2008). Implants in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective 5-year follow-up clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 19(12), 1226-1232.
13. Bianchi A.E. and Sanfilippo F. (2004). Single-tooth replacement by immediate implant and connective tissue graft: a 1-9-year clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res, 15(3), 269-277.