RESULTS OF APPLYING THE ENIO SCORE IN PREDICTING EXTUBATION OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH BRAIN INJURY

Vu Van Kham1, Le Huu A1, Ho Sy Hai1, Hoang Van Tuan1, Nguyen Van Hoang1
1 Bach Mai Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background


Extubation in patients with traumatic brain injury is a challenging clinical decision. Extubation failure increases the risk of pneumonia, prolongs mechanical ventilation duration, and increases mortality. Conventional weaning criteria do not adequately reflect airway protection ability and neurological recovery. The ENIO score integrates neurological and respiratory factors to support the prediction of extubation outcomes. However, the ENIO score has not been widely studied in Vietnam.


Objective


To analyze factors associated with extubation outcomes and evaluate the value of the ENIO score in predicting extubation success in patients with traumatic brain injury.


Methods


A retrospective descriptive study was conducted at the Center of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Bach Mai Hospital, from January 2025 to October 2025. The study included patients with brain injury, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤12, and invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours. Patients underwent extubation after successful weaning from mechanical ventilation. Outcomes were classified as successful or failed extubation within 5 days after extubation.


Results


Among 111 studied patients, 75 patients (67.6%) had successful extubation, while 36 patients (32.4%) experienced extubation failure. Factors associated with successful extubation included strong cough reflex (81.3% vs. 33.3%; p<0.001), higher motor GCS score (p=0.006), and lower frequency of sputum suctioning (p<0.001). The ENIO score was significantly higher in the successful extubation group compared with the failure group (median 63 vs. 39), indicating good discriminative ability of the ENIO score for extubation outcomes.


Conclusion


The simplified ENIO score is a useful tool for predicting extubation outcomes. Factors strongly associated with extubation success include strong cough reflex, lower sputum suctioning requirement, and higher motor GCS score. The ENIO score should be combined with clinical assessment, particularly cough reflex and motor GCS evaluation, to support safer extubation decisions in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Article Details

References

[1] Cinotti R, Mijangos JC, Pelosi P, et al. (2022). Extubation in neurocritical care patients: the ENIO international prospective study. Intensive Care Medicine, 48(11), 1539-1550.
[2] Asehnoune K, Seguin P, Lasocki S, et al. (2017). Extubation success prediction in a multicentric cohort of patients with severe brain injury (VISAGE Score). Anesthesiology, 127(2), 338-346.
[3] Smina M, Salam A, Khamiees M, et al. (2003). Cough peak flows and extubation outcomes. Chest, 124(1), 262-268.
[4] Duan J, Zhou L, Xiao M, et al. (2015). Semiquantitative cough strength score for predicting reintubation after planned extubation. American Journal of Critical Care, 24(6), e86-e90.
[5] Coplin WM, Pierson DJ, Cooley KD, et al. (2000). Implications of extubation delay in brain-injured patients meeting standard weaning criteria. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 161(5), 1530-1536.
[6] Epstein SK, Ciubotaru RL. (1998). Independent effects of etiology of failure and time to reintubation on outcome for patients failing extubation. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 158(2), 489-493.
[7] Namen AM, Ely EW, Tatter SB, et al. (2001). Predictors of successful extubation in neurosurgical patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 163(3), 658-664.
[8] Godet T, Chabanne R, Marin J, et al. (2017). Extubation failure in brain-injured patients: risk factors and development of a prediction score in a preliminary prospective cohort study. Anesthesiology, 126(1), 104-114.
[9] Zhang X, Zheng S, Chen C, et al. (2025). Risk factors for failing endotracheal extubation in neurocritical patients: a retrospective cohort study. Frontiers in Neurology, 16, 1562454.