STUDY OF SEVERAL FACTORS RELATED TO THE OUTCOME OF LAPAROSCOPIC RETROPERITONEAL SURGERY USING THE ARTISENTIAL MECHANICAL ROBOTIC ARM FOR NEPHRECTOMY DUE TO SOME BENIGN PATHOLOGIES

Nguyen Van Thanh1, Truong Thanh Tung2, Pham Van Duyet3
1 Sam Son General Hospital
2 Thanh Hoa provincial General Hospital
3 Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigates several factors related to surgical time, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for non-functioning kidneys due to certain benign pathologies.


Subjects and methods: We conducted a descriptive study with retrospective and prospective components on 73 patients treated at Thanh Hoa provincial General Hospital from January 2022 to June 2025. Univariable analyses were followed by generalized linear models for operative time and postoperative hospital stay, and multivariable logistic regression for postoperative complications.


Results: Mean operative time was 71.6 minutes, mean postoperative hospital stay was 8.2 days, and the postoperative complication rate was 15.1%. Absence of previous renal disease treatment reduced operative time by 14.4% compared with a positive treatment history (p = 0.035). Each additional day before drain removal increased postoperative hospital stay by 3.2% (p = 0.001), whereas absence of postoperative complications reduced hospital stay by 36.4% (p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood transfusion was independently associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications (OR = 15.353; 95% CI: 1.748-134.877; p = 0.014).


Conclusions: Patients with no prior medical history, including internal medical conditions and renal disease, had a 14.4% shorter operative time than those with a history of comorbidities. Each 1-day increase in drainage removal time was associated with a 3.2% increase in postoperative length of hospital stay. The absence of postoperative complications reduced the postoperative hospital stay by 36.4%. The indication for blood transfusion was associated with an approximately 15-fold higher risk of complications compared with no transfusion.

Article Details

References

[1] Tepeler A, Akman T, Tok A et al. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for non-functioning kidneys related to renal stone disease. Urol Res, 2012, 40 (5): 559-565. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0466-2
[2] Garg M, Singh V, Sinha R.J, Sharma P. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy. Urology, 2014, 84 (2): 335-339. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.04.038
[3] Kim J.K, Kang B, Kim Y.S et al. Laparoscopic renal surgery using multi degree-of-freedom articulating laparoscopic instruments in a porcine model. Investig Clin Urol, 2023, 64 (1): 91-101. doi: 10.4111/icu.20220182
[4] Kim J.K, Kang B, Kim Y.S et al. Evaluation of the suitability of using Artisential in various renal surgery: IDEAL stage 1 study. BMC Urol, 2024, 24 (1): 164. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01539-z
[5] Asai S, Fukumoto T, Watanabe R et al. New classification of hydronephrosis on 18F-FDG-PET/CT predicts post-operative renal function and muscle-invasive disease in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2018, 48 (11): 1022-1027. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyy135
[6] Onen A. Grading of hydronephrosis: an ongoing challenge. Front Pediatr, 2020, 8: 458. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00458
[7] Gupta N.P, Hemal A.K, Mishra S, Dogra P.N, Kumar R. Outcome of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for benign nonfunctioning kidney: a single-center experience. Journal of Endourology, 2008, 22 (4): 693-698. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0267
[8] Lorenz E.P.M, Zühlke H.V, Lange R, Savvas V. Pathophysiology and Classification of Adhesions. In: Treutner KH, Schumpelick V, eds. Peritoneal Adhesions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1997: 29-34. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-60433-1_4
[9 Clavien P.A, Barkun J, de Oliveira M.L et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg, 2009, 250 (2): 187-196. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
[10] Hemal A.K, Gupta N.P, Wadhwa S.N, Goel A, Kumar R. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy for benign nonfunctioning kidneys: a single-center experience. Urology, 2001, 57 (4): 644-649. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01059-1
[11] Pham N.H, Phan K.S, Bui C.L.K et al. Three-dimensional laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign nonfunctioning kidneys: a single-center initial experience. Cureus, 2024, 16 (5): e60352. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60352
[12] Saifee Y, Nagarajan R, Qadri S.J et al. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for benign nonfunctioning kidneys: training and outcome. Indian J Urol, 2016, 32 (4): 301-305. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.189724
[13] Xu Z, Xin M, Hong-Zhao L, Zhong C, Li L.C, Ye Z.Q. Retroperitoneoscopic subcapsular nephrectomy for infective nonfunctioning kidney with dense perinephric adhesions. BJU Int, 2004, 94 (9): 1329-1331. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05166.x