Article Sidebar

Published: 2026-05-25
Abstract Views: 0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v67i5.5139
Issue
Vol. 67 No. 5
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Khánh, N. M., Quân, N. H., Hoàng, L. X., Cử, N. H., & Tuấn, L. A. (2026). SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY USING MOBILE-BEARING IMPLANTS AT VIET DUC UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL. Vietnam Journal of Community Medicine, 67(5). https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v67i5.5139

SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY USING MOBILE-BEARING IMPLANTS AT VIET DUC UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Nguyen Manh Khanh1, Nguyen Hoang Quan1, Le Xuan Hoang1, Nguyen Huu Cu2, Le Anh Tuan1
1 Department of Upper Extremity Surgery and Sports Medicine, Viet Duc University Hospital
2 Ha Dong General Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed at Viet Duc University Hospital.


Subjects and methods: This study is a case series including six patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at Viet Duc University Hospital. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively.


Results: After surgery, the VAS pain score decreased from 7-8/10 points to 1-3/10 points. The KSS increased from 40-45 points preoperatively to 75-85 points postoperatively. Knee range of motion improved markedly, with an average postoperative flexion of 110-115°.


Conclusion: Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty is a safe and effective treatment for knee osteoarthritis, providing significant pain relief and improvement in knee function.

Article Details

Keywords

Knee osteoarthritis, total knee arthroplasty, Mobile Bearing, KSS, VAS.

References

[1] Carr A.J et al. Knee replacement. The Lancet, 2012, 379 (9823): 1331-1340.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6
[2] Smith A.J et al. Mobile Bearing versus Fixed Bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2017, 32 (5): 1669-1678. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.019.
[3] Hunter D.J, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis The Lancet, 2019, 393: 1745-1759. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30417-9.
[4] Insall J.N et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1989, 248: 13-14. doi: 10.1097/00003086-198911000-00004.
[5] Lingard E.A et al. Predicting outcome of TKA. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 2004, 86: 2179-2186. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200410000-00008
[6] Kim Y.H, Park J.W, Kim J.S. Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume, 2014, 96 (6): e48. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00277.
[7] Callaghan J.J et al. Mobile Bearing knee replacement complications. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 2000, 82: 102-111. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200001000-00013