EVALUATION OF INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL AND EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF BIOCHEMICAL TESTS AT THE LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF BINH THUAN TRADITIONAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION HOSPITAL IN 2024
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate external quality assessment (EQA) and internal quality control (IQC) of several biochemical tests and determine the error rate of related factors at the Laboratory Department - Binh Thuan Traditional Medicine and Rehabilitation Hospital in 2024.
Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study. External and internal quality control results of 10 biochemical parameters were evaluated on the Erba XL 200 automated biochemistry analyzer from April to September 2024. Randox control serum at 2 concentration levels was used to assess precision, trueness, and accuracy according to the Westgard Desirable Biological Variation Database. External quality assessment was evaluated using the Standard Deviation Index (SDI) and Target Score. Errors were classified into 4 causal groups (equipment, reagents, personnel, environment) based on daily internal quality control incident records.
Results: Most biochemical parameters had CV% within allowable limits, except for Creatinine, which failed to meet CV% criteria across all 6 months, and HDL-C, which showed a Bias-D of 19.2% — exceeding the allowable threshold by nearly 3.5-fold. External quality assessment achieved 91.7% of results with SDI < 2.0. Equipment and reagents were the two primary error-contributing factors, accounting for 43.6% and 38.2% respectively.
Conclusion: Overall external and internal quality control performance was satisfactory; however, Creatinine and HDL-C require priority improvement. Equipment and reagent-related errors were 2–3 times higher than those attributable to personnel and environmental factors.
Article Details
Keywords
Laboratory quality, external quality assessment, internal quality control, biochemistry, Westgard.
References
[2] Westgard JO. A method evaluation decision chart (MEDx chart) for judging method performance. Clin Lab Sci. 1995;8(5):277-83.
[3] Nanda SK, Ray L. Quantitative application of sigma metrics in medical biochemistry. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(12):2689-91. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2013/7292.3700
[4] Schoenmakers CH, Naus AJ, Vermeer HJ, et al. Practical application of Sigma Metrics QC procedures in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49(11):1837-43. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.249
[5] Hoàng Mạnh Cường. Nghiên cứu áp dụng thang sigma trong quản lý chất lượng xét nghiệm hóa sinh lâm sàng [Luận văn cao học]. Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội. 2019.
[6] Trịnh Thị Phương Dung, Nguyễn Thị Thanh Ngân, Hoàng Thị Xuân và cộng sự. Áp dụng thang sigma trong đánh giá hiệu năng phương pháp giai đoạn trong xét nghiệm. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2023;520(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v520i2.4177
[7] Nguyễn Tấn Bỉnh, Tăng Chí Thượng. Đánh giá kết quả triển khai chính sách quản lý chất lượng xét nghiệm tại thành phố Hồ Chí Minh và các tỉnh giai đoạn 2007-2014. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2014;425:5-12.
[8] Westgard JO. Basic QC Practices. 3rd ed. Westgard QC. Inc. 2010.