PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF THE CURRENT STATUS OF SICK BUILDING SYNDROME IN SELECTED DEPARTMENTS OF HANOI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL 2026

Le Ngoc Ha1,2, Do Nguyen Vu1, Hoang Minh Duc2, Dinh Thi Thanh2, Luu Thi Thao2, Dang Thi Thoa2, Nguyen Minh Ha3
1 Hanoi Medical University
2 Hanoi Medical University Hospital
3 Vietnam University of Traditional Medicine

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Assessment of the current status of sick building syndrome among healthcare workers in some departments/centers at Hanoi Medical University Hospital 2026.


Research methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 132 healthcare workers at Hanoi Medical University Hospital in 2026 with the aim of surveying the prevalence of sick house syndrome through the MM040EA questionnaire.


Results: The average closed-door syndrome score was 10.1 ± 4.3. Multivariate regression analysis identified associated factors that increased closed-door syndrome scores, including: high work pressure (β = 4.22; p = 0.043), stuffy air (β = 3.51; p < 0.001), annoying noise (β = 2.46; p = 0.040), poor hygiene (β = 2.24; p = 0.003), female gender (β = 2.05; p = 0.028), and allergy history (β = 1.48; p = 0.041).


Conclusion: The prevalence of sick building syndrome at the hospital was at a notable level (10.1 ± 4.3 points), with fatigue and headache being the predominant complaints. Workload pressure and stuffy indoor air were the factors most strongly affecting staff health. Improvements in building ventilation and adjustments to work intensity are necessary to ensure the occupational health and safety of healthcare workers

Article Details

References

[1] Burge P.S. Sick building syndrome. Occup Environ Med, 2004, 61 (2): 185-190. doi: 10.1136/oem.2003.008813.
[2] WHO. WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: dampness and mould, 2009. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789289041683.
[3] Hellgren U.M, Reijula K. Indoor air problems in hospitals: a challenge for occupational health. Aaohn J, 2011, 59 (3): 111-117. doi: 10.3928/08910162-20110223-01.
[4] Kalender-Smajlović S, Dovjak M, Kukec A. Sick building syndrome among healthcare workers and healthcare associates at observed general hospital in Slovenia. Cent Eur J Public Health, 2021, 29 (1): 28-37. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a6108.
[5] Quoc Bang Ho, Khue Vu, Hiep Duc Nguyen et al. Assessment of air quality and health impact in Hanoi (Vietnam) due to traffic emission - seasonal analysis and traffic emission reduction scenarios. Accessed February 18, 2026. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/16/11/1301.
[6] Cuong Hoang Quoc, Giang Vu Huong, Hai Nguyen Duc. Working conditions and sick building syndrome among health care workers in Vietnam. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17 (10): 3635. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103635.
[7] Arikan İ, Tekin Ö.F, Erbas O. Relationship between sick buildıng syndrome and indoor air quality among hospital staff. Med Lav, 2018, 109 (6): 435-443. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v110i6.7628.
[8] Mahdizadeh A, Kia N.S, Pahlevan D. Prevalence of sick building syndrome and its related factors in medical staff in Iran: a cross-sectional study. Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health Studies, 2023, 11 (4): e141003. doi: 10.5812/mejrh-141003.
[9] Marmot A.F, Eley J, Stafford M et al. Building health: an epidemiological study of “sick building syndrome” in the Whitehall II study. Occup Environ Med, 2006, 63 (4): 283-289. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.022889.
[10] Xu L, Hu Y, Liang W. Subjective and objective sensory assessments of indoor air quality in college dormitories in Nanjing. Build Environ, 2022, 212: 108802. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108802.