COMPARISON OF POINT-OF-CARE TESTING AND CENTRAL LABORATORY RESULTS FOR ELECTROLYTE PANEL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the measurement bias, correlation, and limits of agreement between arterial and venous blood in electrolyte testing.
Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Gia Dinh People’s Hospital from June to December 2025. Hospitalized patients with simultaneous orders for ABG and venous biochemistry tests (using lithium heparin tubes) were enrolled. Paired arterial and venous blood samples were collected concurrently and analyzed using the RapidPoint 500 blood gas analyzer (direct ISE) and the AU5800 biochemistry analyzer (indirect ISE), respectively. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests, Pearson correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman plots.
Results: 347 paired arterial and venous blood samples. The mean electrolyte concentrations in arterial blood were consistently lower than those in venous blood. The mean differences (arterial - venous) were -3.11 mmol/L for Na⁺, -0.45 mmol/L for K⁺, and -2.58 mmol/L for Cl⁻, all of which were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated strong linear correlations between the two sample types (Na⁺: r = 0.857; K⁺: r = 0.887; Cl⁻: r = 0.853; all p < 0.001). However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed wide limits of agreement, particularly for Na⁺ and Cl⁻. When compared with Total Allowable Error (TEa) criteria, the proportion of samples exceeding acceptable clinical limits was substantial (Na⁺: 37.8%; K⁺: 33.4%; Cl⁻: 82.7%), indicating limited agreement between the two measurement methods.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated a significant difference between electrolyte results obtained from arterial blood (direct ISE) and venous blood (indirect ISE). The observed bias exceeded the Total Allowable Error, particularly for sodium (Na⁺) and chloride (Cl⁻), indicating that the two methods are not interchangeable in clinical practice. However, potassium (K⁺) results obtained from arterial blood gas analysis may be used for reference in emergency situations when venous sampling is not feasible, but they should be confirmed by standard biochemical testing under routine conditions.
Article Details
Keywords
Electrolyte panel, arterial blood gas, direct ISE, indirect ISE, venous blood.
References
[2] Bishop M.L, Fody E.P, Van Siclen C, March Mistler J. Clinical chemistry: principles, techniques, and correlations, 9th ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, 2022.
[3] Tang S et al. Comparative analysis of hemoglobin, potassium, sodium, and glucose in arterial blood gas and venous blood of patients with COPD. Sci Rep, 2024, 14 (1): 5194. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55992-9.
[4] Devaki R.N et al. A retrospective database analysis to investigate if electrolytes in venous blood are equivalent to the levels in arterial blood. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 2024, 28 (5): 442-446. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24702.
[5] Mikun M, Sivakumar K, Thangaraj P, Thamarai R. Comparison of sodium and potassium values in arterial and venous blood samples. MGM J Med Sci, 2024, 11 (3): 455-459. doi: 10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_180_24
[6] Ustundağ Y et al. Interchangeability of sodium and potassium result values of arterial blood gas with laboratory analyzer: narrative review. Indian J Crit Care Med, 2019, 23 (1): 35-42. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23110.
[7] Prasad H et al. Correlation and agreement between arterial and venous blood gas analysis in patients with hypotension - an emergency department-based cross-sectional study. Int J Emerg Med, 2023, 16 (1): 18. doi: 10.1186/s12245-023-00486-0
[8] Westgard QC. 2025 CLIA acceptance limits for proficiency testing, November 19, 2025. https://westgard.com/clia-a-quality/quality-requirements/2024-clia-requirements.html
[9] Budd J.R et al. EP09-A3: Measurement procedure comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; approved guideline, 3rd ed. Pittsburgh, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2013.