EFFECTIVENESS OF A TELEREHABILITATION PROGRAM FOLLOWING ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION OF THE KNEE JOINT

Truong Thi Hai Anh1,2, Dang Thi Thu Hang1,2, Ha Chan Nhan1,2
1 Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University
2 Hospital of Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee joint.


Subjects and methods: A quasi-experimental controlled study with pre- and post-intervention assessments was conducted on 50 patients post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction from November 2024 to July 2025. Participants were divided into 2 groups: conventional rehabilitation (n = 25) and telerehabilitation via the OpenTeleRehab application (n = 25). The numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain, knee range of motion (ROM), and the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form were assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention. ANCOVA was utilized to adjust for baseline differences in knee flexion ROM.


Results: After 4 weeks, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding improvements in NRS, IKDC scores, or knee extension ROM (p > 0.05). Notably, after adjusting for baseline values, the telerehabilitation group showed significantly greater improvement in knee flexion ROM compared to the conventional rehabilitation group (46.60° ± 14.84° vs 24.00° ± 17.14°; p = 0.048).


Conclusion: Telerehabilitation is an effective and feasible approach during the early phase after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, yielding functional and range-of-motion improvements that are comparable to or better than conventional methods.

Article Details

References

[1] van Melick N, van Cingel R.E et al. Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med, 2016, 50 (24): 1506-15. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095898.
[2] Logerstedt D.S, Scalzitti D et al. Knee stability and movement coordination impairments: knee ligament sprain revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2017, 47 (11): A1-A47. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.0303.
[3] Nguyen S.P, Tran H.T et al. Caregiver perceptions, practices, and challenges in accessing rehabilitation services for people with disabilities in rural Vietnam. Disabilities, 2025, 5 (2): 44. doi: 10.3390/disabilities5020044.
[4] Cottrell M.A, Galea O.A et al. Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil, 2017, 31 (5): 625-38. doi: 10.1177/0269215516645148.
[5] Lim J.Y, Yu H.J et al. Effectiveness of in-home, augmented reality-based telerehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial. Orthop J Sports Med, 2024, 12 (10): 23259671241271729. doi: 10.1177/23259671241271729.
[6] Liao W.J, Lee K.T et al. Postoperative rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction through telerehabilitation with artificial intelligence brace during COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Med, 2023, 12 (14). doi: 10.3390/jcm12144865.