PREVALENCE OF BACTERIAL CONTAMINATION ON SMARTPHONE SURFACES AMONG OUTPATIENTS AT TRA VINH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: Survey on the rate of bacterial infection and characteristics of bacteria isolated from smartphone surfaces of outpatients at Tra Vinh University Hospital.
Methods: The cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 61 outpatients at the examination area of Tra Vinh University Hospital for 10 weeks (10–12/2022). Sample size 61, convenient sample selection. Bacteria are taken from the touch screen and the back surface of the smartphone with sterile cotton swabs, cultured and identified by biochemical tests. Data analysis using STATA 17.0 with Chi-squared, Fisher, and pre-existing ratio (PR) tests.
Results: All smartphones (100%, 61/61) were contaminated with bacteria. Gram-positive bacteria predominated on both surfaces. Bacillus spp. were the most frequently isolated organisms on the touchscreen (91.8%) and the rear surface (93.44%), followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (60.66% and 49.18%, respectively). The rear surface exhibited a higher prevalence of Gram-negative bacterial contamination (63.93%), including clinically important pathogens such as Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas spp. Smartphone cleaning was associated with a reduced prevalence of bacterial contamination on the touchscreen (PR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.52–0.79; p = 0.018), whereas weekly or monthly cleaning frequency was associated with an increased risk of polymicrobial contamination. Proper hand hygiene was associated with a decreased risk of bacterial contamination on the rear surface (PR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.70–0.94; p = 0.041).
Conclusion: Outpatient smartphones are a potential source of bacteria, especially on the back surface. It is necessary to strengthen smartphone hygiene combined with proper hand hygiene to limit the spread of bacteria.
Article Details
Keywords
Bacterial Contamination, Smartphones, Outpatients
References
[2] Al-Ghamdi AK and et al (2011), "Bacterial contamination of computer keyboards and mice, elevator buttons and shopping cards," African Journal of Microbiology Research, pp. 3998-4003. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR11.770
[3] S.A.Soto and et al (2006), "Communication in critical care environments: mobile
telephones improve patient care," Analgesia, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 535-541. DOI:10.1213/01.ane.0000194506.79408.79
[4] Tagoe and et al (2011), "Bacterial contamination of mobile phones: when your mobile phone could transmit more than just a call", https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:38846446
[5] Verran and Joanna (2012), "The microbial contamination of mobile communication devices," Journal of microbiology biology education, vol. 13, no.1, pp. 59-61. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.351
[6] Kuriyama and et al (2021), "Prevalence of bacterial contamination of touchscreens
and posterior surfaces of smartphones owned by healthcare workers: a crosssectional study," BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 681. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06379-y
[7] Bộ y tế (2017), Hướng dẫn thực hành kỹ thuật vi sinh lâm sàng, Nhà xuất bản Y học Hà Nội.
[8] Cao Minh Nga (2016), Vi khuẩn y học, Nhà xuất bản Y học.
[9] Linda Chan (2017), "Coagulase negative staphylococci," DermNet all about the
skin.
[10] K.A.Koscova and et al (2018), "Degree of Bacterial Contamination of Mobile Phone and Computer Keyboard Surfaces and Efficacy of Disinfection with Chlorhexidine Digluconate and Triclosan to Its Reduction," International journal of environmental research and public health, vol. 15, no.10. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102238