OUTCOMES OF LOWER LIMB REHABILITATION USING THE ROBOTIC GAIT TRAINING SYSTEM IN STROKE PATIENTS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background:
Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability in adults, in which recovery of walking ability plays a crucial role for patients with lower-limb paralysis. Recently, the GTR-A adaptive robotic gait training system has been implemented at the Rehabilitation Center of Bach Mai Hospital; however, its clinical effectiveness in Vietnam has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of lower-limb rehabilitation in stroke patients using the GTR-A system.
Methods:
A prospective, non-controlled interventional study with a pre–post design and a comparative analysis between two intervention groups was conducted on 32 patients with post-stroke hemiplegia and a Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) score ≥2. Patients were randomly assigned to either a Passive training group or an Active-Assisted training group. The robotic gait training program using the GTR-A system was performed three sessions per week for one month. Outcome measures included heart rate parameters, FAC, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and patient satisfaction.
Results:
After the intervention, both groups showed statistically significant improvements in most outcome measures (p<0.05). The Active-Assisted group demonstrated greater improvement in BBS scores compared with the Passive group. Heart rate values increased after training, reflecting appropriate exercise intensity within a safe physiological range. Patient satisfaction scores increased significantly in both groups (p<0.001).
Conclusion:
Lower-limb rehabilitation using the GTR-A robotic gait training system significantly improves balance, motor control, and mobility in patients after stroke. Active-assisted training shows certain advantages over passive training.
Article Details
Keywords
Stroke; GTR-A robot; rehabilitation; lower limbs; gait training.
References
[2] D. T. Mai, X. C. Dao, N. K. Luong, T. K. Nguyen, H. T. Nguyen, and T. N. Nguyen, “Current State of Stroke Care in Vietnam,” Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology, vol. 2, no. 2, p. e000331, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1161/SVIN.121.000331.
[3] C. English, S. Hillier, and E. Lynch, “Circuit Class Therapy for Improving Mobility After Stroke,” Stroke, vol. 48, p. STROKEAHA.117.018601, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018601.
[4] J. Teodoro, S. Fernandes, C. Castro, and J. B. Fernandes, “Current Trends in Gait Rehabilitation for Stroke Survivors: A Scoping Review of Randomized Controlled Trials,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 13, no. 5, Art. no. 5, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/jcm13051358.
[5] “Robot-assisted gait training improves brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity and peak aerobic capacity in subacute stroke patients with totally dependent ambulation: Randomized controlled trial - PMC.” Accessed: Oct. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5072950/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
[6] L. Xie, B. H. Yoon, C. Park, and J. (Sung) H. You, “Optimal Intervention Timing for Robotic-Assisted Gait Training in Hemiplegic Stroke,” Brain Sciences, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 1058, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081058.
[7] “Update on Stroke Rehabilitation in Motor Impairment,” 뇌신경재활, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1–13, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.12786/bn.2022.15.e12.
[8] J. H. Lee and G. Kim, “Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 14, no. 13, p. 4809, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/jcm14134809.
[9] R. S. Calabrò et al., “Robotic gait rehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: where are we now?,” Neurol Sci, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 503–514, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10072-016-2474-4.