PERCEPTIONS AND EDUCATIONAL NEEDS REGARDING GLOBAL HEALTH AMONG VIETNAMESE HEALTH SCIENCE STUDENTS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: In the 21st century, Global Health (GH) has transitioned from a peripheral topic to a core component of medical education. However, in developing nations like Vietnam, the integration of GH curricula remains limited, and there is a paucity of data regarding students' specific educational needs. This study explored the qualitative definitions of GH among Vietnamese health science students and their expectations for future curriculum development.
Materials and Methods: A qualitative survey study utilizing open-ended questionnaires was conducted at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City from June to July 2025. This article analyzes textual responses from a sample of 532 undergraduate students across six faculties. Data regarding students' definitions of GH and recommendations for education were analyzed using Inductive Content Analysis to identify significant themes.
Results: The analysis identified two primary themes. First, student conceptualizations of GH were predominantly disease-centric, reflecting a pandemic legacy, although a humanistic and ethical perspective also emerged. Second, there was a strong demand for pragmatic educational transformation, with specific requests to integrate GH into Case-Based Learning and utilize social media as an educational tool.
Conclusion: Vietnamese health science students possess diverse but fragmented conceptualizations of GH, often conflating the field with disease control. Consequently, there is a critical need for a practical integration model in health professions education that shifts the focus from theory to clinical application and leverages digital platforms to meet learner expectations.
Article Details
Keywords
Global Health; Qualitative Research; Curriculum; Health Occupations Students; Vietnam.
References
2. Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, Reddy KS, Rodriguez MH, Sewankambo NK, et al. Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet. 2009;373(9679):1993-5. 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60332-9
3. Rowson M, Smith A, Hughes R, Johnson O, Maini A, Martin S, et al. The evolution of global health teaching in undergraduate medical curricula. Global Health. 2012;8:35. 10.1186/1744-8603-8-35
4. Malik S, Alkoronky A, Elmahi M, Alsafi S, Shehada F, Rahma R, et al. Global health in undergraduate education: knowledge, attitude, and practice of Sudanese medical students towards global health education: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):230. 10.1186/s12909-023-04168-6
5. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing. 2008;62(1):107-15. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
6. Agardh C, Bielik J, Ekman AT, Velin L, Herzig van Wees S. From curriculum to clinic: a qualitative study of junior doctors' perceptions of global health and sustainable development. BMJ Glob Health. 2024;9(11). 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015107
7. Blum N, Berlin A, Isaacs A, Burch WJ, Willott C. Medical students as global citizens: a qualitative study of medical students' views on global health teaching within the undergraduate medical curriculum. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):175. 10.1186/s12909-019-1631-x
8. Metzl JM, Hansen H. Structural competency: theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality. Social science & medicine (1982). 2014;103:126-33. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.032
9. Purba AK, Pearce A, Henderson M, McKee M, Katikireddi SV. Social media as a determinant of health. European Journal of Public Health. 2024;34(3):425-6. 10.1093/eurpub/ckae029