50. SURVEY ON THE KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF PSORIASIS PATIENTS TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To survey the knowledge and attitudes of psoriasis patients towards artificial intelligence applications.
Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 309 psoriasis patients at the National Hospital of Dermatology and Venereology from February 2024 to May 2024.
Results: The majority of patients (91.9%) were unaware of AI applications. Most patients trusted AI diagnosis only if it was confirmed by a specialist doctor, with a consensus of 70.6%. The perceived benefits of AI include providing data for medical research, improving diagnostic accuracy, and increasing access to healthcare services. The three biggest obstacles were patients' uncertainty about using AI (72.1%), difficulty in use (68.4%), and lack of time (49.0%). Regarding the use of AI applications to diagnose psoriasis, 64.7% of patients considered this application useful. However, only a small proportion (18.4%) expressed a willingness to use the AI application. The level of understanding of the patients is closely related to their educational level and age.
Conclusion: Due to the low level of understanding and trust in AI among psoriasis patients, they were not inclined to use AI applications. However, patients believed that using AI for diagnosing psoriasis via clinical images was useful. This indicates the need for better education and clarification about the benefits of AI technology in dermatology to improve patient acceptance and utilization.
Article Details
Keywords
survey, knowledge, artificial intelligence, psoriasis.
References
[2] Damiani G, Bragazzi NL, Karimkhani Aksut C, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of psoriasis: results and insights from the global burden of disease 2019 study. 2021;8:743180.
[3] Golbari NM, Porter ML, Kimball ABJC. Current guidelines for psoriasis treatment: a work in progress. 2018;101(3S):10-12.
[4] Eapen BRJIdoj. Artificial intelligence in dermatology: A practical introduction to a paradigm shift. 2020;11(6):881.
[5] Khang TH. Bệnh học da liễu – Tập 1. Nhà xuất bản Y học; 2017.
[6] Solmaz D, Bakirci S, Kimyon G, et al. Impact of having family history of psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis on psoriatic disease. 2020;72(1):63-68.
[7] Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, Schwartz LH, Aerts HJJNRC. Artificial intelligence in radiology. 2018;18(8):500-510.
[8] Johnson KW, Torres Soto J, Glicksberg BS, et al. Artificial intelligence in cardiology. 2018;71(23):2668-2679.
[9] Shimizu H, Nakayama KIJCs. Artificial intelligence in oncology. 2020;111(5):1452-1460.
[10] Yu K-H, Beam AL, Kohane ISJNbe. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. 2018;2(10):719-731.
[11] Yakar D, Ongena YP, Kwee TC, Haan MJViH. Do people favor artificial intelligence over physicians? A survey among the general population and their view on artificial intelligence in medicine. 2022;25(3):374-381.
[12] Widaatalla Y, Wolswijk T, Adan F, et al. The application of artificial intelligence in the detection of basal cell carcinoma: A systematic review. 2023;37(6):1160-1167.
[13] Aggarwal R, Farag S, Martin G, Ashrafian H, Darzi AJJomIr. Patient perceptions on data sharing and applying artificial intelligence to health care data: cross-sectional survey. 2021;23(8):e26162.
[14] Fritsch SJ, Blankenheim A, Wahl A, et al. Attitudes and perception of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A cross-sectional survey among patients. 2022;8:20552076221116772.
[15] Polesie S, Gillstedt M, Kittler H, et al. Attitudes towards artificial intelligence within dermatology: an international online survey. British Journal of Dermatology. 2020;183(1):159-161. doi:10.1111/bjd.18875 %J British Journal of Dermatology
[16] Scheetz J, Rothschild P, McGuinness M, et al. A survey of clinicians on the use of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology, dermatology, radiology and radiation oncology. 2021;11(1):5193.