Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2024-12-02
Abstract Views: 25
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 16
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v65iCD11.1784
Issue
Vol. 65 No. CĐ11 - Liên chi hội CTCH TP.HCM
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Nhân, N. Đỗ, & Thanh, L. Đình. (2024). 47. EVALUATION OF APPLYING ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS (EMR) IN THE TREATMENT OF SERIOUS ILLNESSES AT THONG NHAT HOSPITAL. Vietnam Journal of Community Medicine, 65(CĐ11 - Liên chi hội CTCH TP.HCM). https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v65iCD11.1784

47. EVALUATION OF APPLYING ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS (EMR) IN THE TREATMENT OF SERIOUS ILLNESSES AT THONG NHAT HOSPITAL

Nguyen Do Nhan1, Le Dinh Thanh1,2
1 Thong Nhat Hospital
2 University of Health Sciences, Vietnam National University at Ho Chi Minh City

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Evaluating the effectiveness of EMR in the treatment of critically ill patients.


Subject and method: retrospective description of multi-trauma patients treated with EMR from 04/2023 to 10/2024 at the Department of Cardiology, Thong Nhat Hospital.


Results: 39 cases. Under 60 years old is 76.9%. Male is 79.5%. Traffic accident is 46.1%. EMR Access mean time (seconds): medical record 05.3 + 04.5, test 10.2 + 02.2, history 07.3 + 01.4. Rate of error in records 35.9%. Type of error is missing test name 17.9%. There are no cases of wrong type or dose of medicine. Rate of satisfaction is 84.6%. ISS > 25 is 35.9%. Results reached 76.9%, cardiovascular group 64.7%, thoracic group 72.7%.


Conclusion: Electronic medical records are one of the important areas in applying digital technology to the Vietnamese healthcare system. EMR at Thong Nhat Hospital has shown promising initial results. Integrating artificial intelligence in EMR is of interest to the government and is an inevitable trend.

Article Details

Keywords

Electronic medical record (EMR), treatment, multiple trauma

References

[1] Adam Bednorz, Jonathan K L Mak. Use of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) in Gerontology: Benefits, Considerations and a Promising Future. Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Dec 23:18:2171-2183.
[2] Andrew T. Jebb, Vincent Ng. A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995–2019. Front Psychol. 2021; 12: 637547. Published online 2021 May 4.
[3] H.C. Pape, L. Leenen. Polytrauma management - What is new and what is true in 2020?. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jan; 12(1): 88–95. Published online 2020 Oct 29.
[4] Hui Li, Yue-Feng Ma. New injury severity score (NISS) outperforms injury severity score (ISS) in the evaluation of severe blunt trauma patients. Chin J Traumatol. 2021 Sep; 24(5): 261–265. Published online 2021 Jan 19.
[5] Baumeister R. F., Vohs K. D., Funder D. C. Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspect. Psychol. 2007. Sci. 2 396–403. 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x
[6] Clark L. A., Watson D. Constructing validity: new developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychol. Assess. 2019. 31:1412. 10.1037/pas0000626
[7] Adekunle O.A, Jeremiah O. A. The impact of electronic health records on patient care and outcomes: A comprehensive review. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews .2024. 21(2):1446-1455
[8] Janett RS, Yeracaris PP. Electronic Medical Records in the American Health System: challenges and lessons learned. Cien Saude Colet. 2020;25(4):1293–1304. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232020254.28922019
[9] Todd OM, Burton JK, Dodds RM, et al. New Horizons in the use of routine data for ageing research. Age Ageing. 2020;49(5):716–72.
[10] Ashika Jain, Muhammad Waseem. Chest Trauma. NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan