54. ANALYSIS THE FACTORS RELATED TO SPECIMEN REJECTION AT THE LABORATORY DEPARTMENT
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: The study focuses on identifying the proportion of rejected specimen and understanding the factors related to the rejection process.
Subject and method: This is a retrospective descriptive study conducted at the Laboratory Department of HCMC Hospital For Rehabilitation – Professional Diseases. Data was collected from January 2023 to December 2023, encompassing 77,767 clinical specimens.
Results: Out of 77,767 specimens, 289 (0.37%) were rejected. Among these, 83.39% of the rejected samples were due to quality issues, including coagulation and hemolysis, while 16.61% were rejected due to administrative errors, such as missing or incorrect information on the sample or test order form.
Conclusion: The study found that most specimen rejections were due to quality issues, with fewer linked to administrative errors. Nurses, responsible for collecting, recording, preserving, and transporting specimens, play a critical role. Errors like incomplete documentation or improper collection techniques can increase rejection rates. Enhancing nurses' skills in specimen handling is vital to reducing rejections, improving lab quality, and ensuring accurate diagnostic results.
Article Details
Keywords
Specimen rejection, Sample quality issues, Laboratory quality control
References
[2] Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Dung, và cộng sự. Thực trạng từ chối mẫu bệnh phẩm tại bệnh viện đa khoa Đức Giang. Tạp chí điều dưỡng. 2021:64-68.
[3] Cao Liyun, Chen M, Phipps RA, et al. Causes and impact of specimen rejection in a clinical chemistry laboratory. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2016/07/01/ 2016;458:154-158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2016.05.003
[4] Kadic D, Avdagic Ismic A, Hasic S. The prevalence of pre-analytical errors in the laboratory of the Cantonal Hospital Zenica in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Med Glas (Zenica). Feb 1 2019;16(1):1-6. doi:10.17392/979-19
[5] Lee NY. Reduction of pre-analytical errors in the clinical laboratory at the University Hospital of Korea through quality improvement activities. Clin Biochem. Aug 2019;70:24-29. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem. 2019.05.016