31. CURRENT STATUS OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE OF BACTERIA CAUSING INTRA-ABDOMINAL INFECTION AND SOME DIFFICULTIES DURING TREATMENT AT THE INTENSIVE CARE DEPARTMENT OF VIET DUC UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Nguyen Thi Nham1, Do Trung Dung1, Le Tuyet Nhung1
1 Viet Duc University Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Intra abdominal infection is a common acute disease with a high mortality rate in the surgical intensive care unit of Viet Duc University Hospital. Determining the cause of the disease and the level of antibiotic resistance of bacteria is very important in orienting early treatment with empirical antibiotics.


Subjects and methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study on patients with abdominal infections treated at Intensive Care Department 1 and 2, Viet Duc University Hospital from January to June 2024. Specimens were taken during surgery or under ultrasound to send microorganisms to culture and identify bacteria.


Results: There were 47 patients with intra abdominal infection in the study. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit are often in a state of septic shock with a SOFA score in 24 hours upon admission of 8 ± 3.9, pathological causes accounted for 70%, trauma 30%, average treatment time was 17 days. The mortality rate is up to 34%. From patient samples, 52 bacterial strains were isolated, Gram-negative bacilli accounting for 65.4%. The three most common bacterial strains in intra abdominal infections are Enterococcus 28.8%, Escherichia coli (23%), Klebsiella (25%). The rate of bacteria resistant to Ampicillin was 87%, Ciprofloxacin 79.4%. Enterococcus was 78.5% resistant to tygecycline, 1 sample was resistant to vancomycin. The bacteria group Klebsiella, Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas had the strongest antibiotic resistance, 93.3% were resistant to meropenem, 92.5% with Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin.


Conclusions: Patients with intra abdominal infections admitted to the intensive care unit are often in a state of severe septic shock, require long-term treatment, and have a high mortality rate. Gram-negative bacteria are the common cause of 65.4% of diseases, with a high level of antibiotic resistance.

Article Details

References

[1] Blot S, Antonelli M, Arvaniti K et al, Epidemiology of intra-abdominal infection and sepsis in critically ill patients: “AbSeS”, a multinational observational cohort study and ESICM Trials Group Project, Intensive Care Med, 2019, 45(12): 1703-1717. doi:10.1007/s00134-019-05819-3.
[2] Perrone G, Sartelli M, Mario G et al, Management of intra-abdominal-infections: 2017 World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines summary focused on remote areas and low-income nations, Int J Infect Dis IJID Off Publ Int Soc Infect Dis., 2020, 99: 140-148. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.046.
[3] Sartelli M, Chichom-Mefire A, Labricciosa FM et al, The management of intra-abdominal infections from a global perspective: 2017 WSES
guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections, World J Emerg Surg WJES, 2017, 12:29. doi:10.1186/s13017-017-0141-6.
[4] Tuyến NT, Đào TTA, Hòa VĐ và CS, Phân tích hiệu quả của Tigecyclin trong điều trị nhiễm khuẩn ổ bụng trên bệnh nhân nặng tại khoa Hồi
sức tích cực, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai, Published online, 2020.
[5] Ái ĐQ, Hằng HTT, Nghiên cứu thực trạng đề kháng kháng sinh của vi khuẩn gây nhiễm khuẩn ổ bụng tại khoa Ngoại tổng hợp, Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội, Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 2023, 526(1A). doi:10.51298/vmj. v526i1A.5363.
[6] Vũ TD, Đặng QT, Tình hình nhiễm vi khuẩn Gram âm ở bệnh nhân mới vào khoa Hồi sức tích cực, Bệnh viện Bạch Mai năm 2020-2021, Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 2021, 507(2). doi:10.51298/vmj.v507i2.1465
[7] Thắng NT, Khâm VV, Quốc LM, Giang NT, Đánh giá thực trạng tăng áp lực ổ bụng trên 50 bệnh nhân sau phẫu thuật bụng có sốc nhiễm
khuẩn, Tạp chí Y học Quân sự, 2024, (370): 4-4. doi:10.59459/1859-1655/JMM.451.
[8] Kołpa M, Wałaszek M, Gniadek A, Wolak Z, Dobroś W, Incidence, Microbiological Profile and Risk Factors of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Intensive Care Units: A 10 Year Observation in a Provincial Hospital in Southern Poland, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018,
15(1): 112. doi:10.3390/ijerph15010112.