35. MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS RETURNED TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT UNPLANNED WITHIN 72 HOURS AT TAN PHU DISTRICT HOSPITAL, IN 2019

Luong Van Sinh1, Bui Thi Nhi1, Hoang Thi Phuong Thao1
1 Tan Phu Dist Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Backgrounds: Describe the management results of patients returning to the Emergency Department unplanned within 72 hours and some correlated factors at Tan Phu Dist Hospital, 2019.


Methods: A retrospective study collected patient data at the Emergency Department, Tan Phu Dist Hospital using Hsoft hospital management software from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019.


Results: There were 22,417 eligible patients, and 340 patients returned within 72 hours, accounting for 1.5%. Some differences between the two groups of patients who returned and did not return to the emergency department within 72 hours: The group of patients who returned had a higher average age of 49 ± 19 (p < 0.01), more women than men (p < 0.01), higher health insurance payments (p < 0.001), longer emergency hospital stay (p < 0.01) and a higher proportion of hospital stays over 120 minutes (p < 0.01). Intestinal infections, dengue fever, vestibular disorders, hypertension, and digestive disorders had a higher rate (p < 0.01). The group of patients who returned to the emergency department and had to be hospitalized was 71.18%. Patients with health insurance, diagnosed with 1 of 5 diseases (intestinal infection, vestibular disorder, dengue fever, hypertension, and digestive disorder) had a higher risk of return than other diseases (p < 0.05). Patients with a hospital stay in the emergency department ≥ 120 minutes had an OR = 1.31, p < 0.05 compared with the group < 120 minutes.


Conclusions: The management results of patients returning to the emergency department within 72 hours showed a trend towards older patients, women, using health insurance, longer emergency hospital stays, and five medical conditions including intestinal infections, vestibular disorders, dengue fever, hypertension, digestive disorders.

Article Details

References

[1] Alberto Jiménez Puente, Antonio Lara-Blanquer, et al (2015) "Causes of 72-hour return visits to hospital emergency departments". Emergencias, 27, 287-293.
[2] Amy Hui Sian Chan, Shu Fang Ho, et al (2016) "Characteristics of patients who made a return visit within 72 hours to the emergency department of a Singapore tertiary hospital". Singapor Med J, 57 (6), 301-306
[3] CP Ng, CH Chung (2003) "An analysis of unscheduled return visits to the accident and emergency department of a general public hospital".
Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 10(3)
[4] Debra White (5/2010) Seventy Two Hour Emergency Department Returns, Master of Nursing, Washington state university, 3.
[5] Guan Lin Goh, Peiqi Huang, et al (6/2016) "Unplanned reattendances at the paediatric emergency department within 72 hours: A one-year experience in KKH". Singapore Med J 57 (6), 307-313.
[6] Hassan Barzegari, Mohammad Ali Fahimi, Schwann Dehghanian, et al (2017) "Emergency Department Readmission Rate within 72 Hours after Discharge; a Letter to Editor". Emerg (Teharan), 5 (2), 64.
[7] Julius Cuong Pham, Thomas Dean Kirsch, et al (4/2011) "Seventy-two-hour Returns May Not be a Good Indicator of Safety in the Emergency Department: A National Study". Acad EmergMed, 18 (4), 390-397.
[8] Lisa Calder, Anita Pozgay, et al (2/2015) "Adverse events in patients with return emergency department visits". BMJ Qual Saf 24 (2), 142–148.
[9] Mazen El Sayed, Elsy Jabbour, et al (1/2016) "Discharge Against Medical Advice From the Emergency Department: Results From a Tertiary Care Hospital in Beirut, Lebanon". Medicine, 95(6)
[10] S Nunez, A Hexdall, et al (2006) "Unscheduled returns to the emergency department: An outcome of medical errors?". Qual Saf Health Care 15, 102–108.