30. EVALUATION OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR SUTURING PERFORATED DUODENAL BULB ULCER AT E HOSPITAL FROM 1/2018 TO 12/2022

Nguyen Huu Sam1, Do Truong s2,3
1 Dại Nam University
2 E Hospital
3 Hanoi Medical University

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of endoscopic surgery for suturing
perforated duodenal bulb ulcers at E Hospital from January 2018 to December 2022.


Research Method: A retrospective study was conducted on 122 patients with perforated duodenal
bulb ulcers who underwent endoscopic suturing at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and
General Surgery, E Hospital , from January 2018 to December 2022


Results: All cases involved a single anterior duodenal bulb perforation. The success rate of
endoscopic suturing for duodenal bulb perforated ulcers was 121 out of 122 cases, with one case
requiring conversion to open surgery. The average surgical duration was 77.55 ± 28.5 minutes, and
no intraoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative pain was low, as evidenced by the
use of pain medication for an average of 2.7 ± 1.8 days. The average time for resumption of bowel
movements was 3.42 ± 1.71 days. There were no cases of gastric output exceeding 500ml per day,
and abdominal drainage was removed after 6.1 ± 2.5 days. 89.4% of patients had follow-up
appointments scheduled for one year after surgery, and 12.3% experienced mild epigastric
discomfort. Late complications included hypertrophic scars (2 cases), stenosis at the anastomotic
site (1 case), recurrent perforation (1 case), and recurrent ulceration at the suture site (5 cases).


Conclusion: Endoscopic surgery for suturing perforated duodenal bulb ulcers offers several
benefits for patients. It is associated with a shorter treatment duration, reduced postoperative pain,
low complication rates, and low mortality rates.

Article Details

References

[1] Stern E, Sugumar K, Journey JD, Peptic Ulcer
Perforated. [Updated 2023 Jun 12]. In:
StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL):
StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
[2] Boey J, Choi SKY, Alagaratnam TT et al., Risk
Stratification in Perforated Duodenal Ulcers: A
Prospective Validation of Predictive Factors.
Ann Surg, 1987, 205(1), 22-26.
[3] Sartelli M et al., World J Emerg Surg.
2020;15:27.
[4] Hữu Hoài Anh, Đánh giá kết quả ứng dụng phẫu
thuật nội soi tại Bệnh viện E, Y học thực hành;
2007;579,580:293-297
[5] Nathanson LK et al. Gastrointest Endosc.
1990;36(2):235-238.
[6] Phạm Đức Huấn, Nguyễn Hoàng, Thủng ổ loét
dạ dày tá tràng. Bài giảng bệnh học Ngoại khoa
dùng cho sinh viên năm thứ tư, Bộ môn Ngoại
trường Đại học Y Hà Nội, Nhà xuất bản y học,
2022 (30-39)
[7] A Tarasconi, F Coccolini, WL Biffl et al.,
Perforated and bleeding peptic ulcer: WSES
guidelines. World J Emerg Surg; 2020, 15: 3.
[8] Bertleff, Marietta, Johan F. Lange, Perforated
Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Review of History and
Treatment. Digestive Surgery 27 (2010): 161 - 169.
[9] Đặng Quốc Ái, Kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi khâu
lỗ thủng ổ loét hành tá tràng tại bệnh viện Đại
học Y Hà Nội. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 2020,
497, 268 - 271
[10] Trần Mạnh Cường, Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật
nội soi điều trị thủng ổ loét hành tá tràng tại BV
Bạch Mai từ năm 2013-2018. Luận án thạc sỹ y
học, Đại học Y Hà Nội, 2018.
[11] Trần Mạnh Hùng, Trần Hiếu Học, Trần Quế
Sơn, Kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi khâu lỗ thủng ổ
loét hành tá tràng tại Bệnh viện Bạch Mai giai
đoạn 2019-2020, Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, Tập
501 số 2, 2021.