Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2024-06-10
Abstract Views: 64
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 46
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v65i4.1212
Issue
Vol. 65 No. 4
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Yến, Đinh T. ., Hải, P. N. ., Hương, T. T. ., Kiên, B. T. ., Tuấn, N. Đức ., & Dân, V. M. . (2024). 24. PERCEPTION OF FACIAL AESTHETICS IN STANDARDIZED PHOTOS AMONG STUDENTS OF HANOI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY IN 2023. Vietnam Journal of Community Medicine, 65(4). https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v65i4.1212

24. PERCEPTION OF FACIAL AESTHETICS IN STANDARDIZED PHOTOS AMONG STUDENTS OF HANOI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY IN 2023

Dinh Thi Yen1, Pham Nhu Hai1, Tran Thu Huong1, Bui Trung Kien2, Nguyen Duc Tuan2, Vu Manh Dan3
1 University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hanoi National University
2 Hanoi Medical University
3 Thai Binh Provincial General Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Faces play an important role in human social interactions. An unaesthetic face can
affect people's physical, mental, psychosocial and emotional health, causing them to lose their
confidence.
Objective: Describe the current status of face perception on standardized images in students of Hanoi
National University in 2023.


Method: Cross-sectional descriptive study conducted on 259 students.


Results: Short, straight male faces and straight, average female faces have the highest average scores
of 8.25 and 8.61; Long, concave male and female face types have the lowest average scores of 2.09
and 2.52.


Conclusion: Short, straight male faces and straight, average female faces are the most beautiful,
concave, long male and female faces are the worst. There is no significant difference in the perception
of beauty of facial types between student groups.

Article Details

Keywords

Perception, Facial profile, Aesthetics, Treatment necessity.

References

[1] Abu Arqoub SH, Al-Khateeb SN, Perception of
facial profile attractiveness of different anteroposterior
and vertical proportions. Eur J Orthod
33:103–111, 2011.
[2] Trehan M, Naqvi ZA, Sharma S, Perception of
facial profile: How you feel about
yourself. International Journal of Clinical
Pediatric Dentistry, 4(2), 109, 2011.
[3] Falkensammer F, Loesch A, Krall C et al., The
impact of education on the perception of facial
profile aesthetics and treatment need. Aesthetic
plastic surgery, 38, 2014, 620-631.
[4] Lina S. Ali, Amal H. Abuaffan, Facial profile
preferences, self-awareness and perception
among a sample of university students; General
dentist, 2015. DOI:10.15761/CCRR.1000178
[5] Türkkahraman H, Gökalp H, Facial profile
preferences among various layers of Turkish
population. The Angle Orthodontist, 74(5), 2004,
640-647.
[6] Johnston DJ, Orlagh t Hunt, Chris J et al., The
influence of lower face vertical proportion on
facial attractiveness. The European Journal of
Orthodontics, 27.4 (2005): 349-354.
[7] Erbay EF, Caniklioglu CM, Soft tissue profile in
Anatolian Turkish adults: Part II. Comparison of
different soft tissue analyses in the evaluation of
beauty. American Journal of Orthodontics and
Dentofacial Orthopedics 121: 65–72, 2002.
[8] Al Taki A., Guidoum A., Facial profile
preferences, self-awareness and perception
among groups of people in the United Arab
Emirates. Journal of orthodontic science, 3(2),
2014, 55