11. OUTCOMES OF CT-SCANNER DIAGNOSIS ACUTE PANCREASITIS WITH FLUID COLLECTIONS AT MILITARY HOSPITAL 103

Ho Chi Thanh1, Lai Ba Thanh1
1 Military Hospital 103

Main Article Content

Abstract

Aim: Evaluation of the value of CT-scanner to diagnose acute pancreatitis with fluid collection.


Objects and methods: Study of 181 acute pancreatitis with fluid collection treated by ultrasound – guided percutaneous catheter drainage at Military Hospital 103 from January 2021 to May 2023. The patient undergone multiple detector scan of abdomen with contrast in the first day. The examination, diagnosis, and treatment according to the guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) 2019.


Results: CT-Scanner with contrast agent, Balthazar grade E was the most (56.9%), followed by grade D and C (28.7% and 13.8%), there was 1 case of grade B. Correct diagnosis of acute necrotizing pancreatitis was 98.1%, sensitivity was 82.1%, specificity was 96.5%, positive predictive value was 98.1%, negative predictive value was 71.8% and Kappa index was 0.73. Clinically appropriate CTSI index was 71.8%, of which 94.1% was suitable for mild level, 65.3% for moderate level and 56.3% for severe level.


Conclusions: CT-Scanner with contrast agent to diagnose acute necrotizing pancreatitis has high sensitivity and specificity, however, the accuracy rate of using CTSI indext to reflex the disease condition was low. Therefore, patient should be taken CT-Scanner again after 72 hours of admission for a more accurate diagnosis.

Article Details

References

[1] Leppäniemi A, Tolonen M, Tarasconi A et al.,
WSES guidelines for the management of severe
acute pancreatitis. World J Emerg Surg, 14, (27),
2019.
[2] Balthazar EJ et al., Acute pancreatitis: value of
CT in establishing prognosis, Radiology. 174(2),
331-336, 1990
[3] Freeny PC, Hauptmann E, Althaus SJ et al.,
Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of
infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis:
techniques and results. AJR Am J Roentgenol;
170: 969 – 975, 1998
[4] Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C et al.,
Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012:
revision of the Atlanta classification and
definitions by international consensus. Gut.
62(1): 102-11, 2013.
[5] Balthazar EJ, Acute Pancreatitis: Assessment of
Severity with Clinical and CT Evaluation,
Radiology, 223: 603–613, 2002.
[6] Yadav AK, Sharma R, Kandasamy D et al.,
Perfusion CT: Can it predict the development of
pancreatic necrosis in early stage of severe acute
pancreatitis. Abdominal Imaging,. DOI:
10.1007/s00261-014-0226-6, 2014.
[7] Working Group IAP, APA Acute Pancreatitis
Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines
for the management of acute pancreatitis,
Pancreatology; 13(4 Suppl 2), e1-15, 2013
[8] Fung C, Svystun O, Fouladi DF et al., CT
imaging, classification, and complications of
acute pancreatitis. Abdominal Imaging, DOI:
10.1007/s00261-019-02236-4. 2019
[9] Urooj T, Shoukat S, Bokhari I et al., Diagnostic
accuracy of contrast enhanced computed
tomography (CECT) in detection of necrosis in
acute pancreatitis by taking surgical findings as
gold standard, J Pak Med Assoc, 70(11),1930-
1933, 2020.
[10] Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L et al., A
modified CT severity index for evaluating acute
pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient
outcome, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 183(5):1261-5,
2004.