Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2024-05-30
Abstract Views: 116
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 50
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v65iCD4.1183
Issue
Vol. 65 No. CĐ 4 - Hội Y học Giới tính Việt Nam
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Quốc, T. Đoàn T. ., Tuấn, Đặng Q. ., Minh, N. C. ., & Dũng, M. B. T. . (2024). 34. VIDEO ENDOSCOPIC INGUINAL LYMPHADENECTOMY IN FIRST 14 PATIENTS WITH PENILE SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA AT BINH DAN HOSPITAL. Vietnam Journal of Community Medicine, 65(CĐ 4 - Hội Y học Giới tính Việt Nam). https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v65iCD4.1183

34. VIDEO ENDOSCOPIC INGUINAL LYMPHADENECTOMY IN FIRST 14 PATIENTS WITH PENILE SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA AT BINH DAN HOSPITAL

Tran Doan Thien Quoc1,2, Dang Quang Tuan3, Nguyen Cong Minh2,3, Mai Ba Tien Dung2,3
1 Trường Đại học Y khoa Phạm Ngọc Thạch
2 Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine
3 Binh Dan Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Inguinal lymph node involvement is an important prognostic factor in penile cancer. Inguinal lymph node dissection allows staging and treatment of inguinal nodal disease. However, it causes morbidity and is associated with complications such as lymphocele, skin loss, and infection.


Aims: To evaluate the results of video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma at Binh Dan hospital.


Materials and Methods: It is a cohort study, 14 patients underwent VEIL in 2022. Data analyzed included mean operative time, mean lymph node yield, complications, recurrent rate and survivl rate.


Results: The mean age of patients was 50.8 years (range: 44–58 years). Mean operative time for VEIL was 203,3 min (130–250 min). Mean lymph node yield was 8,3(range: 6-12 nodes). No intraoperative complication was experienced during the series. We noted that 1 case has surgical emphysema on 1 groin (7,1%), 2 cases have localized lymphocele (14,2%). After 1 year, no recurrent case andh survival rate is 100%.


Conclusions: VEIL is a safe and feasible technique in patients with penile carcinoma who require radical inguinal lymphadenectomy. It allows the removal of inguinal lymph nodes and reduces surgical morbidity substantially.

Article Details

Keywords

Penile cancer, video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy.

References

[1] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE et al., Cancer
Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7-
33. doi:10.3322/caac.21654.
[2] Sharma P, Zargar H, Spiess PE. Surgical
Advances in Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection:
Optimizing Treatment Outcomes. Urologic
Clinics of North America. 2016;43(4):457-468.
doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2016.06.007.
[3] Dorff TB, Ballas LK, Schuckman AK. Current
Management Strategy for Penile Cancer
and Future Directions. Curr Oncol Rep.
2017;19(8):54. doi:10.1007/s11912-017-0615-4.
[4] Hakenberg OW, Dräger DL, Erbersdobler A
et al., The Diagnosis and Treatment of Penile
Cancer. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115(39):646-
652. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2018.0646.
[5] Koifman L, Hampl D, Koifman N et al.,
Radical open inguinal lymphadenectomy
for penile carcinoma: surgical technique,
early complications and late outcomes. J
Urol. 2013;190(6):2086-2092. doi:10.1016/j.
juro.2013.06.016.
[6] Stuiver MM, Djajadiningrat RS, Graafland
NM et al., Early wound complications after
inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: a
historical cohort study and risk-factor analysis.
Eur Urol. 2013;64(3):486-492. doi:10.1016/j.
eururo.2013.02.037.
[7] Kumar V, Sethia KK. Prospective study
comparing video-endoscopic radical inguinal
lymph node dissection (VEILND) with open
radical ILND (OILND) for penile cancer over
an 8-year period. BJU Int. 2017;119(4):530-534.
doi:10.1111/bju.13660.
[8] Yadav SS, Tomar V, Bhattar R et al., Video
Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy vs
Open Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Carcinoma
Penis: Expanding Role and Comparison
of Outcomes. Urology. 2018;113:79-84.
doi:10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.007
[9] Bevan-Thomas R, Slaton JW, Pettaway CA.
Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy
for penile squamous cell carcinoma: the M.D.
Anderson Cancer Center Experience. J Urol.
2002;167(4):1638-1642.
[10] Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management
of penile cancer - PubMed. Accessed April
30, 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/19264390/
[11] Bouchot O, Rigaud J, Maillet F et al., Morbidity
of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive
penile carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2004;45(6):761-
765; discussion 765-766. doi:10.1016/j.
eururo.2003.12.003.
[12] Catalona WJ. Modified inguinal
lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis
with preservation of saphenous veins: technique
and preliminary results. J Urol. 1988;140(2):306-
310. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41589-8.
[13] Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy
(VEIL)--a prospective critical perioperative
assessment of feasibility and morbidity with
points of technique in penile carcinoma -
PubMed. Accessed April 30, 2024. https://
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23432959/
[14] Hu J, Li H, Cui Y et al., Comparison of
clinical feasibility and oncological outcomes
between video endoscopic and open inguinal
lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine
(Baltimore). 2019;98(22):e15862. doi:10.1097/
MD.0000000000015862.
[15] Kandasamy SG, Chandran KR, Pooleri GK.
Minimal invasive approaches in lymph node
management of carcinoma of penis: A review.
Indian J Urol. 2022;38(1):15-21. doi:10.4103/
iju.iju_387_21.
[16] Li J, Zhu Y, Zhang SL et al., Organ-sparing
surgery for penile cancer: complications and
outcomes. Urology. 2011;78(5):1121-1124.
doi:10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.006.