Thanh bên bài viết

PDF
Đã xuất bản: 2026-01-12
Số lượt xem tóm tắt: 0
Số lượt xem PDF: 0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v66i8.4068
Số xuất bản
Tập 66 Số VoL66. English Version No.2, 2025
Chuyên mục
Bài báo khoa học
Cách trích dẫn
Hau, N. D., Nga, N. T., Huyen, T. T., & Mo, N. T. (2026). EVALUATING THE RESULTS OF PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER TECHNIQUE AND RELATED FACTORS IN NEONATES AT PHU THO PROVINCIAL OBSTETRICS AND PEDIATRICS HOSPITAL. Tạp Chí Y học Cộng đồng, 66(VoL66. English Version No.2, 2025). https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v66i8.4068

EVALUATING THE RESULTS OF PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER TECHNIQUE AND RELATED FACTORS IN NEONATES AT PHU THO PROVINCIAL OBSTETRICS AND PEDIATRICS HOSPITAL

Nguyen Duc Hau1, Nguyen Thi Nga2, Tuong Thu Huyen1, Nguyen Trang Mo1
1 Phu Tho provincial Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital
2 Saint Paul General Hospital

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

Objective: To evaluate the results of peripherally inserted central catheter technique and describe factors related to the results of insertion and maintenance of peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates at Phu Tho provincial Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital in 2025.


Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study analyzed over 120 cases of peripherally inserted central catheter in 116 neonates from January 2024 to September 2025.


Results: The majority of peripherally inserted central catheter placements were successful (96.7% after intervention). 80.8% of catheters were in the correct central position immediately after insertion. The average duration of catheter maintenance was 18.1-19.35 days. The rate of central line-associated bloodstream infection was significantly higher in neonates with lower gestational age (p = 0.026) and lower birth weight (p = 0.021). Non-central tip position increased the risk of infection by 3.9 times compared to central position (p = 0.017).


Conclusion: Peripherally inserted central catheter is a highly effective technique for long-term infusion in neonates. Low birth weight, low gestational age, and non-central catheter tip position are significant risk factors for complications, especially central line-associated bloodstream infection.

Chi tiết bài viết

Từ khóa

PICC, neonates, CLABSI, Phu Tho provincial Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital.

Tài liệu tham khảo

[1] Janes M, Kalyn A, Pinelli J et al. A randomized trial comparing peripherally inserted central venous catheters and peripheral intravenous catheters in very low birth weight infants. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 2000, 35 (7): 1040-1044. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.7767.
[2] Chait P.G, Ingram J, Phillips-Gordon C et al. Peripherally inserted central catheters in children. Radiology, 1995, 197 (3): 775-778. doi: 10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480755.
[3] Seckold T, Walker S, Dwyer T. A comparison of silicone and polyurethane PICC lines and post-insertion complication rates: A systematic review. Journal of Vascular Access, 2015, 16 (3): 167-177. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000336.
[4] Khalid F, Douglas J, Wayne A et al. Variations in nosocomial infection rates in Canadian neonatal intensive care units may be practice-related. BMC Pediatrics, 2005, 5: 22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-5-22.
[5] Sengupta A, Lehmann C, Diener-West M, Perl T.M, Milstone A.M. Catheter duration and risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection in neonates with PICCs. Pediatrics, 2010, 125 (4): 648-653. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2559.
[6] Yu X, Yue S, Wang M et al. Risk factors related to non-elective removal of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates. BioMed Research International, 2018, 2018: 3769376. doi: 10.1155/2018/3769376.
[7] Milstone A.M, Reich N.G, Advani S et al. Catheter dwell time and central line-associated bloodstream infection in neonates with PICCs: A multicenter cohort study. Pediatrics, 2013, 132 (6): e1609-e1615. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1645.