33. EVALUATION OF EARLY OUTCOMES OF LAPAROSCOPIC LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION WITH STAPLED ANASTOMOSIS FOR RECTAL CANCER AT MILITARY HOSPITAL 175
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
Objective: To evaluate the early outcomes of laparoscopic segmental colectomy and stapled anastomosis for rectal cancer treatment at Military Hospital 175.
Subjects and Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional design, incorporating both retrospective and prospective data collection, conducted at Military Hospital 175 from January 2023 to May 2025. The study included 72 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic segmental colectomy using stapling devices.
Results:
A total of 72 patients underwent laparoscopic rectal resection with a mean age of 62.7 ± 9.7 years and a mean BMI of 24.3 ± 2.1 kg/m². Most patients were classified as stage III (58.3%), with 69.5% presenting T3 tumors. The average operative time was 166.7 ± 50.7 minutes, which correlated significantly with disease stage (p = 0.048). Gastrointestinal function recovered early, with mean times to flatus, oral intake, and defecation of 2.26, 2.25, and 2.6 days, respectively. Early postoperative complications occurred in 7.0% of patients, all of whom were managed conservatively. The mean hospital stay was 7.62 days.
Conclusion:
Laparoscopic rectal resection demonstrated favorable short-term outcomes, including early gastrointestinal recovery, low complication rates, and acceptable operative times, supporting its clinical applicability in rectal cancer management
Chi tiết bài viết
Từ khóa
Laparoscopic anterior resection, Stapled anastomosis, Mandibular trauma, Short-term surgical outcomes, Rectal cancer
Tài liệu tham khảo
[2] Rawla P, Sunkara T, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. 2019;89–103.
[3] Bärlehner E, Benhidjeb T, Anders S, Schicke B. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature. Surg Endosc. 2005 Jun;19(6):757–66.
[4] Ding Z, Wang Z, Huang S, Zhong S, Lin J. Comparison of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for rectal cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb;6(2):170–6.
[5] Cảnh NT, Anh TH, Phong TĐT, Phong CTT, Hoá NV, Anh NT, et al. Đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và kết quả điều trị sớm ung thư trực tràng bằng phẫu thuật nội soi và các yếu tố liên quan tại bệnh viện đa khoa trung ương cần thơ. Tạp chí Y dược học Cần Thơ. 2023 Dec 25;(69):50–7.
[6] Chen W, Li Q, Fan Y, Li D, Jiang L, Qiu P, et al. Factors Predicting Difficulty of Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer with Total Mesorectal Excision and Double Stapling Technique. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0151773.
[7] Van der Pas MHGM, Deijen CL, Abis GSA, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, Haglind E, Fürst A, et al. Conversions in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017 May 1;31(5):2263–70.
[8] Ding X, Yu Y, Chen M, Wang C, Kang Y, Lou J. Causative agents and outcome of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients: community-acquired versus nosocomial infections. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2019 May 23;19(1):463.
[9] Trịnh Đình Hiệp, Hải ĐS, Hoàng LT, Liên NTD, Thắng TT, Thanh HC. Đánh giá kết quả sớm phẫu thuật nội soi cắt đoạn đại trực tràng nối máy điều trị ung thư trực tràng tại Bệnh Viện Quân Y 7a. Tạp chí y dược học Quân sự. 2022 Oct 28;47(8):133–44.
[10] Gupta D, Gunter MJ, Yang K, Lee S, Zuckerwise L, Chen L, et al. Performance of Serum CA125 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Patients With Uterine Papillary Serous Carcinoma. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2011 Apr 1;21(3):529–34.