11. EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OUTCOMES FOR NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF BLUNT RENAL TRAUMA AT PEOPLE'S HOSPITAL 115
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
Objective: To evaluate the non-operative management outcomes of blunt renal trauma and associated factors at People's Hospital 115.
Subjects and Methods: A combined retrospective and prospective cohort study. All cases of blunt renal trauma were treated at People's Hospital 115 from January 2021 to April 2025. The prospective phase was conducted from April 2024 to April 2025, while the retrospective phase spanned from January 2021 to March 2024.
Results:
The mean age of patients was 41.4 ± 17.2 years, with the 20–39 age group being the most affected (40%). Conservative management was the primary treatment modality, applied in 74% of cases, and mainly indicated for low- to moderate-grade injuries. JJ stent placement and angioembolization were performed in 18% and 8% of patients, respectively. Good treatment outcomes were achieved in 84% of patients, with no conversions to open surgery or in-hospital deaths. Complications occurred in only 4% of cases. A statistically significant association was found between treatment outcomes and both injury grade (p = 0.032) and treatment method (p = 0.029). Among patients with good outcomes, 61.9% had a hospital stay of 7 days or longer, while all patients with fair outcomes were hospitalized for 7 days or longer. The difference in hospital stay length between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.043).
Conclusion:
Non-operative management of blunt renal trauma, particularly in hemodynamically stable patients with low- to moderate-grade injuries, is effective and associated with favorable outcomes and low complication rates. The findings support a conservative-first approach, with selective use of JJ stents or angioembolization based on injury severity.
Chi tiết bài viết
Từ khóa
Blunt renal trauma, Non-operative management, JJ stent, Angioembolization.
Tài liệu tham khảo
[2] Veeratterapillay R, Fuge O, Haslam P, Harding C, Thorpe A. Renal trauma. Journal of Clinical Urology. 2017 Jul 1;10(4):379–90.
[3] Serafetinidis E, Campos-Juanatey F, Hallscheidt P, Mahmud H, Mayer E, Schouten N, et al. Summary Paper of the Updated 2023 European Association of Urology Guidelines on Urological Trauma. European Urology Focus. 2024 May 1;10(3):475–85.
[4] Nakao S, Katayama Y, Hirayama A, Hirose T, Ishida K, Umemura Y, et al. Trends and outcomes of blunt renal trauma management: a nationwide cohort study in Japan. World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug 26;15(1):50.
[5] Chow SJD, Thompson KJ, Hartman JF, Wright ML. A 10-year review of blunt renal artery injuries at an urban level I trauma centre. Injury. 2009 Aug 1;40(8):844–50.
[6] Li Y, Hu S, Ding W, Jia Z, Xue T, Jiang L. Efficacy and safety of renal artery embolization for blunt traumatic renal hemorrhage: a multicenter study. Abdom Radiol [Internet]. 2025 Apr 30 [cited 2025 Jun 8]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04967-z
[7] Huy NN, Thu DTN, Khoa TM. Kết quả sớm của 33 trường hợp điều trị bảo tồn ở bệnh nhân chấn thương thận kín tại thành phố cần thơ. ctump. 2024 Aug 2;(77):281–3.
[8] Hoà TQ. Kết quả điều trị bảo tồn chấn thương thận kín tại bệnh viện đại học y hà nội và bệnh viện việt đức. 2023;
[9] Hampson LA, Radadia KD, Odisho AY, McAninch JW, Breyer BN. Conservative Management of High-grade Renal Trauma Does Not Lead to Prolonged Hospital Stay. Urology. 2018 May 1;115:92 5.