IMPACT OF FRONTAL RECESS CROWDING BY OLFACTORY FOSSA DEPTH AND AGGER NASI CELLS ON THE DEGREE OF FRONTAL SINUS OPACIFICATION ON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Nguyen Dinh Chuong1,2, Nguyen Thi Kieu Tho1,2
1 University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
2 Gia Dinh People’s Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the association between olfactory fossa depth according to the Keros classification, agger nasi cells, and frontal sinus opacification on computed tomography, and to analyze the combined role of these two anatomical factors in the frontal recess crowding effect.


Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on 164 sinus sides from 82 adult patients who underwent paranasal sinus computed tomography at Nhan Dan Gia Dinh Hospital from June 2024 to June 2025. Olfactory fossa depth was classified according to the Keros classification. The presence of agger nasi cells and frontal sinus opacification were recorded on computed tomography. Frontal sinus opacification was defined as a Lund-Mackay score of ≥1 for the frontal sinus. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression model was used to adjust for the potential correlation between the two sinus sides within the same patient.


Results: Keros type 2 was the most common anatomical pattern, accounting for 93.9%. The rate of frontal sinus opacification increased with olfactory fossa depth: 0.0% in Keros type 1, 22.7% in Keros type 2, and 60.0% in Keros type 3. The group with Keros type 3 combined with the presence of an agger nasi cell had the highest rate of frontal sinus opacification, reaching 75.0%. GEE analysis showed that when Keros classification was treated as an ordinal variable, a higher Keros grade was associated with an increased likelihood of frontal sinus opacification on computed tomography.


Conclusion: Olfactory fossa depth is associated with frontal sinus opacification on computed tomography. The combination of Keros type 3 and the presence of an agger nasi cell suggests a possible frontal recess crowding effect, which may substantially narrow the frontal recess and impair sinus drainage. Therefore, surgeons should carefully consider adequate surgical clearance of the frontal recess in cases with high-risk anatomical features.

Article Details

References

1. Lund VJ, Stammberger H, Fokkens WJ, Beale T, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Eloy P, et al. European position paper on the anatomical terminology of the internal nose and paranasal sinuses. Rhinology Supplement. 2014;24:1–34.
2. Keros P. On the practical value of differences in the level of the lamina cribrosa of the ethmoid. Zeitschrift fur Laryngologie, Rhinologie, Otologie und ihre Grenzgebiete. 1962;41:809–13.
3. Berger G, Grinevych V, Milewska AJ, Łukasiewicz A, Tarasów E. Estimation of ethmoid roof depth and length of lateral lamella of the cribriform plate, upper attachment of the uncinate process and anterior ethmoid artery in multiplanar reconstructions of Computed Tomography. Polish Journal of Surgery. 2020;92:15–23. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.2471.
4. Wormald PJ. The key to understanding the anatomy of the frontal recess. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:497–507. DOI: 10.1016/S0194-59980301581-X.
5. Lien CF, Weng HH, Chang YC, Lin YC, Wang WH. Computed tomographic analysis of frontal recess anatomy and its effect on the development of frontal sinusitis. The Laryngoscope. 2010;120(12):2521–7. DOI: 10.1002/lary.20977.
6. Naidoo Y, Bassiouni A, Keen M, Wormald PJ, editors. Risk factors and outcomes for primary, revision, and modified Lothrop (Draf III) frontal sinus surgery. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology; 2013: Wiley Online Library. DOI: 10.1002/alr.21109.
7. Tran LV, Ngo NH, Psaltis AJ. A radiological study assessing the prevalence of frontal recess cells and the most common frontal sinus drainage pathways. American journal of rhinology & allergy. 2019;33(3):323–30. DOI: 10.1177/1945892419826228.