EVALUATION OF FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER OUTCOMES FOLLOWING NATURAL CYCLE PROTOCOL AT HANOI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of frozen embryo transfer cycles in which endometrial preparation was performed using a natural cycle protocol in women with regular menstrual cycles.
Materials and methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on patients undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment at Hanoi Medical University Hospital.
Results: A total of 124 patients were included, comprising 63 natural cycles and 61 hormone replacement therapy cycles. The two groups were comparable in age, BMI, duration of infertility, and ovarian reserve parameters. The clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates were 55.6% and 49.2% in the natural cycle group, respectively, comparable to 54.1% and 45.9% in the hormone replacement therapy group (p > 0.05). The incidence of first-trimester bleeding was significantly lower in the natural cycle group compared with the hormone replacement therapy group (11.1% vs. 34.4%; p < 0.05).
Conclusion: In women with regular menstrual cycles, frozen embryo transfer cycles prepared with a natural cycle protocol achieved similar pregnancy outcomes compared with hormone replacement therapy cycles but were associated with fewer early pregnancy complications.
Article Details
Keywords
Frozen embryo transfer, natural cycle, hormone replacement therapy, in vitro fertilization.
References
F, van Wely M. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after natural versus artificial cycle frozen embryo transfer and the role of luteal phase support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update, 2023, 29 (5): 634-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmad011.
[2] Liu X, Shi W, Shi J. Natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer in young women with regular menstrual cycles increases the live-birth rates compared with hormone replacement treatment:a retrospective cohort study. Fertility and Sterility,2020, 113 (4): 811-817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
fertnstert.2019.11.023.
[3] Liu X, Li W, Wen W, Wang T, Wang T, Sun T et al.Natural cycle versus hormone replacement therapy as endometrial preparation in ovulatory women undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer: The compete open-label randomized controlled trial.PLoS Med, 2025, 22 (6): e1004630. https://doi.
org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004856.
[4] Agha-Hosseini M, Hashemi L, Aleyasin A, Ghasemi M, Sarvi F, Shabani Nashtaei M et al. Natural cycle versus artificial cycle in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A randomized prospective trial. Turk J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 15 (1): 12-17. https://doi. org/10.4274/tjod.47855.
[5] Kalem Z, Namlı Kalem M, Bakırarar B, Kent E, Gurgan T. Natural cycle versus hormone replacement therapy cycle in frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Saudi Med J, 2018, 39 (11): 1102-8. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2018.11.23299.
[6] Pape J, Levy J, von Wolff M. Early pregnancy complications after frozen-thawed embryo transfer in different cycle regimens: A retrospective cohort study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2022, 279: 102-106.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.10.015.
[7] Von Versen-Höynck F, Schaub A.M, Chi Y.Y, Chiu K.H, Liu J, Lingis M et al. Increased preeclampsia risk and reduced aortic compliance with in vitro fertilization cycles in the absence of a corpus luteum. Hypertension, 2019, 73 (3): 640-649. https://
doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.118.12043.