Articles Vol. 67 No. VTT

ROLE OF MRI IN THE EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE DAMAGE

Ngo Ho Thai An1,2, Nguyen Kim Vuong3,4
1 Vo Truong Toan University
2 Trường Đại Học Võ Trường Toản
3 Vo Truong Toan University Hospital
4 Bệnh Viện Đại Học Võ Trường Toản
0 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To synthesize up-to-date evidence on the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for early detection of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and cartilage damage before radiographic changes and irreversible structural loss occur.

Methods: A targeted search (2000–2025) was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Scopus using the keywords “osteoarthritis”, “MRI”, “cartilage”, “compositional MRI”, “T1rho”, “T2 mapping”, “dGEMRIC”, “bone marrow lesion”, “MOAKS/WORMS”. Priority was given to human studies and major reviews on early-stage disease and cartilage lesions; case reports and studies not using MRI were excluded.

Results: Compared with radiography, MRI enables whole-joint assessment in early OA, including alterations of the cartilage matrix, meniscal tear/hernation, subchondral bone lesions (BMLs), and synovitis/effusion. Semi-quantitative scoring systems such as WORMS and MOAKS allow reproducible whole-joint evaluation and prognostication. Compositional MRI techniques (T1rho, T2/T2* and dGEMRIC) detect biochemical changes in proteoglycan and collagen networks before morphological cartilage loss, with a certain degree of correlation between techniques [4,5]. BMLs and synovitis are associated with pain and predict structural progression, representing potential therapeutic targets; 3.0-T MRI shows higher sensitivity for detecting cartilage lesions than 1.5-T systems.

Conclusion: MRI provides sensitive and comprehensive assessment in early OA and cartilage damage, supports identification of high-risk patients and monitoring of structural change. Combining whole-joint semi-quantitative scoring with quantitative compositional measurements on optimized 3.0-T MRI constitutes an appropriate framework for early diagnosis, risk stratification and follow-up in clinical practice and clinical trials.

References
[1]
Demehri S, Kasaeian A, Roemer FW, Guermazi A. Osteoarthritis year in review 2022: imaging. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2023;31(8):1003–1011. Google Scholar
[2]
Peterfy CG, Guermazi A, Zaim S, Tirman PFJ, Miaux Y, White D, et al. Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2004;12(3):177–190. Google Scholar
[3]
Hunter DJ, Guermazi A, Lo GH, Grainger AJ, Conaghan PG, Boudreau RM, et al. The development of semi-quantitative whole joint assessment of knee OA: MOAKS. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2011;19(8):990–1002. Google Scholar
[4]
Link TM, Liebl H, Pedoia V, Souza RB, Majumdar S. MRI-based T1rho and T2 cartilage compositional imaging: evidence, techniques, and clinical applications. Cartilage. 2023;14(1_suppl):194S–220S. Google Scholar
[5]
Melkus G, Meder R, Zimmermann J, Scheurecker G, Bieri O, Lippacher S, et al. What is the correlation among dGEMRIC, T1ρ, and T2* maps? Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020;8(12. Google Scholar
[6]
Van Dyck P, Kenis C, Vanhoenacker FM, Lambrecht V, Wouters K, Gielen JL, et al. Comparison of 1.5- and 3-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2014;22(6):1376–1384. Google Scholar
[7]
Herrera D, Almhdie-Imjabbar A, Lespessailles E. MRI-based biomarkers for knee osteoarthritis outcomes: a narrative review of prediction but not association studies. European Journal of Radiology. 2024;181:111731. Google Scholar
[8]
Peterfy CG, Schneider E, Nevitt M. The Osteoarthritis Initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2008;16(12):1433–1441. Google Scholar
[9]
Piccolo CL, Briganti F, Camastra C, et al. Imaging of knee osteoarthritis: a review of multimodal approaches. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. 2023;13(11):7582–7595. Google Scholar