PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, ANTHROPOMETRY, AND SELECTED BIOCHEMICAL INDICATORS AMONG OFFICE WORKERS PRIOR TO A WORKPLACE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY INTERVENTION

Phan Kim Hue1, Truong Thanh Nam1, Huynh Khai Quang2, Bui Thi Bich Thuy1
1 Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2 Hoan My Cuu Long Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To describe physical activity levels, anthropometric characteristics, and selected biochemical markers of office workers prior to the implementation of a workplace physical activity intervention.


Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 66 office employees. Physical activity was assessed using the IPAQ-SF and calculated directly from raw data according to the standard scoring protocol, expressed as MET-minutes/week.


Results: The mean age was 36.2 ± 9.1 years, with equal distribution of males and females. The mean BMI was 23.3 ± 3.4 kg/m², and 27.3% were classified as overweight or obese. The median total physical activity was 1,148 (688-2,314) MET-minutes/week. The proportions of low, moderate, and high physical activity levels were 16.7%, 72.7%, and 10.6%, respectively. No significant difference in total MET was observed by sex (p = 0.462) or age group (p = 0.331). Participants with normal BMI had significantly higher physical activity levels than those with overweight/obesity (p = 0.041). Mean LDL-C was 3.38 ± 0.94 mmol/L; HDL-C 1.29 ± 0.24 mmol/L; and serum uric acid 357.6 ± 86.4 µmol/L.


Conclusion: Most office employees achieved a moderate level of physical activity; however, the prevalence of overweight/obesity and metabolic indicators approaching risk thresholds remains a concern.

Article Details

References

[1] Guthold R, Stevens G.A, Riley L.M, Bull F.C. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys. Lancet Global Health, 2018, 6 (10): e1077-e1086. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7.
[2] World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. Geneva, 2020.
[3] Tran Van Dinh, Nguyen Thi Tho, Tran My Huong. Physical activity and occupational sitting among employees in a research institute in Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2024, 34 (2): 58-66.
[4] Rees-Punia E, Tonorezos E.S, Patel A.V. Effectiveness of interventions on sedentary behaviors in office workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health, 2024, 232: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.03.005.
[5] Park S, Lee S, Woo S et al. Sedentary behaviors and physical activity of the working population measured by accelerometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 2024, 24, 1432. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17439-9.
[6] Tran Thai Phuc, Tran Quang Duc, Vu Thị Quynh Chi, Phan Ngoc Quang. The prevalence of excess weight among Vietnamese adults: a pooled analysis of 58 studies with more than 430 thousand participants over the last three decades. Nutrition and Health, 2023, 29 (3): 443-452. doi: 10.1177/02601060221129440.
[7] Bui Van Tan, Christopher L.B, Luong N.K et al. Physical Activity in Vietnam: Estimates and Measurement Issues. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10): e0140941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140941.
[8] Chu A.H.Y, Ng S.H.X, Koh D, Müller-Riemenschneider F. Domain-specific physical activity and sedentary behaviour in working adults: a systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2023, 64 (1): 25-36.
[9] Ministry of Health Vietnam. National Plan for Noncommunicable Disease Prevention and Control 2022-2030. Hanoi: Ministry of Health, 2022.
[10] IPAQ Research Committee. Guidelines for Data Processing and Analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF), 2005.