CONGENITAL THUMB HYPOPLASIA IN CHILDREN: TYPE II AND III ACCORDING TO THE BLAUTH CLASSIFICATION – DIFFERENTIATION AND TREATMENT TECHNIQUES
Main Article Content
Abstract
To evaluate methods for accurately distinguishing between Type II and Type III thumb hypoplasia according to the Blauth classification based on clinical and radiographic findings, and to assess the outcomes of treatment techniques applied to pediatric patients with congenital thumb hypoplasia treated at the Ho Chi Minh City Hospital of Trauma and Orthopedics.
Materials and Methods:
A prospective descriptive case series conducted from 2022 to 2025 at the Pediatric Orthopedics Department of the Ho Chi Minh City Hospital of Trauma and Orthopedics, including pediatric patients with Type II and Type III thumb hypoplasia according to Blauth classification.
Results:
A total of 8 cases of Type II and Type III thumb hypoplasia were surgically treated. The mean age at the time of surgery was 5.62 years. Among them, there were 2 cases of Type II and 6 cases of Type III (according to the modified Manske classification: 4 cases of Type IIIA and 2 cases of Type IIIB). Treatment methods included opponensplasty (Huber, Riordan techniques), ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction, and metacarpal bone grafting from the foot. Functional outcomes assessed using the James scoring system showed 4 good, 1 fair, 2 average, and 1 poor result.
Conclusion:
Differentiating between Type II and Type IIIA thumb hypoplasia remains challenging in young children due to unclear clinical and imaging features. Careful evaluation of the trapeziometacarpal joint function and the thenar muscle group plays a decisive role in diagnosis and in selecting appropriate treatment methods.
Article Details
Keywords
Thumb hypoplasia, Blauth, Manske, pediatric hand surgery.
References
2. Manske PR, McCarroll Jr HR. James M. Type III-A hypoplastic thumb. J Hand Surg Am. 1995;20(2):246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-5023(05)80018-8
3. Tonkin MA. On the classification of congenital thumb hypoplasia. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014;39(9):948–955. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193413516246
4. Takagi T. Blauth and Manske classifications for thumb hypoplasia, Journal of Hand and Microsurgery, Volume 17, Issue 5, September 2025, 10032 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jham.2025.100323
5. Foucher G, Medina J, Navarro R. Microsurgical reconstruction of the hypoplastic thumb, type IIIB. J Reconstr Microsurg 2001;17:9-15. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-12683
6. Shibata M, Yoshizu T, Seki T, Goto M, Saito H, Tajima T. Reconstruction of a congenital hypoplastic thumb with use of a free vascularized metatarsophalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:1469-76. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199810000-00008
7. Guéro S. Surgical management of the Blauth 1 to 3A thumb hypoplasia, Chir Main 2008 Dec:27 Suppl 1:S62-70.doi: 10.1016/j.main.2008.07.025. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
8. Kollitz K.M., Tomhave W.A., Van Heest A.E., Moran S.L., A New, Direct Measure of Thumb Use in Children After Index Pollicization for Congenital Thumb Hypoplasia, Volume 43, Issue 11 P978-986.E1November 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.02.025.
9. Alain Gilbert , Bran Sivakumar, Traitement conservateur des hypoplasies sévères du pouce -Toe Phalanx Transfer for Blauth Types III B-C and IV Thumb Hypoplasia, E-Mem Acad Natle Chir. 2019;18(1):009 DOI : 10.26299/x0p8-3f25/emem.2019.1.009