IMPROVING THE UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY OF SURGICAL AND PROCEDURAL INSTRUMENT SETS THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF THE HIS PRO INTEROPERABILITY SOFTWARE AT LAO CAI NO.1 GENERAL HOSPITAL

Tran Thi Que Chi1, Tran Thi Que Chi1, Vu Hung Anh1, Tran Lan Anh1, Diem Son1, Le Thi Anh Nguyet2, Pham Huu Thanh2, Pham Ngoc Doan Trang3,4, Le Huyen Trang5
1 Lao Cai Provincial No. 1 General Hospital
2 Lao Cai Provincial No. 1 General Hospita
3 School of Public Health, University of Illinois - Chicago, USA
4 Center for Health Improvement Research (CHIR)
5 International Training and Management Joint Stock Company (Itam)

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of implementing a surgical instrument management software integrated with the Hospital Information System (HIS) in improving instrument utilization efficiency and optimizing management processes at the Infection Control Department of Lao Cai Provincial General Hospital No.1.


Subjects and methods: A quality improvement study based on the Lean Six Sigma methodology using the DMAIC cycle was conducted. Data were collected from all surgical activities during 2024–2025, including the pre-intervention period (January–August 2024), system implementation (September–December 2024), and post-intervention evaluation (2025).


Results: The number of surgeries increased from 8,100 in 2024 to 9,195 in 2025 (13.5% increase). Instrument utilization efficiency improved from 78.3% to 93.4%. The average issuing time decreased from 7.0 to 3.8 minutes per set (45.7% reduction), while the demand aggregation process was fully automated.


Conclusion: Implementation of a HIS-integrated surgical instrument management system significantly improved instrument utilization efficiency, reduced processing time, and minimized unnecessary instrument issuance. This approach enhances management efficiency, optimizes healthcare resources, and contributes to improved patient safety

Article Details

References

[1] WHO. The second global patient safety challenge : safe surgery saves lives. 2008.
[2] Bộ Y tế. Hướng dẫn thực hành kiểm soát nhiễm khuẩn môi trường bệnh viện. 2012 n.d.
[3] Fayad M, Yahiaoui R, Auber F, Pidoux H, Hild O, Picaud F, et al. Traceability of Surgical Instruments: A Systematic Review. Appl Sci 2025;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031592.
[4] WHO. Decontamination and reprocessing of medical devices for health-care facilities. 2016.
[5] Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008 n.d.
[6] Li C-Y, Huang M-H, Lin Y-S, Chu C-M, Pan H-H. Effects of Implementing a Barcode Information Management System on Operating Room Staff: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e56192. https://doi.org/10.2196/56192.
[7] Bộ Y Tế. Quyết định 2491/QĐ-BYT 2023 thực hiện nhiệm vụ trọng tâm về chuyển đổi số 2023-2025. 2023.
[8] Farrokhi FR, Gunther M, Williams B, Blackmore CC. Application of Lean Methodology for Improved Quality and Efficiency in Operating Room Instrument Availability. J Healthc Qual Off Publ Natl Assoc Healthc Qual 2015;37:277–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhq.12053.
[9] Liu J-H, Wu C-Y, Liang W-T, Hsu M-F, Liu C-Y. Smart management of single surgical instruments through unique device identification (UDI) barcode tracking system for enhancing sterilization quality and patient safety. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol ASHE 2025;5:s9–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.101.
[10] Fayad M, Yahiaoui R, Auber F, Pidoux H, Hild O, Picaud F, et al. Traceability of Surgical Instruments: A Systematic Review. Appl Sci 2025;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031592.