Article Sidebar

PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2026-03-31
Abstract Views: 148
Views PDF (Tiếng Việt): 33
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v67i3.4604
Issue
Vol. 67 No. 3
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Hiền, Đỗ T. T., Huế, N. T., & Thanh, T. T. (2026). EVALUATION OF NURSING PAIN MANAGEMENT QUALITY INDEX ON POST-OPERATIVE PATIENTS AT THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL AND DIGESTIVE SURGERY, HAI DUONG PROVINCIAL GENERAL HOSPITAL IN 2024. Vietnam Journal of Community Medicine, 67(3). https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v67i3.4604

EVALUATION OF NURSING PAIN MANAGEMENT QUALITY INDEX ON POST-OPERATIVE PATIENTS AT THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL AND DIGESTIVE SURGERY, HAI DUONG PROVINCIAL GENERAL HOSPITAL IN 2024

Do Thi Thu Hien1, Nguyen Thi Hue1, Trung Thi Thanh1
1 Hai Duong Medical Technical University

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the quality indicators of postoperative pain management among surgical patients at the Department of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Hai Duong Provincial General Hospital in 2024.


Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 295 postoperative patients at the Department of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Hai Duong Provincial General Hospital from February to October 2024. The study used the Strategic and Clinical Quality Indicators in Postoperative Pain Management Questionnaire (SCQIPP), which consists of 14 items, to assess the quality indicators of postoperative pain management performed by nurses. The SCQIPP responses were dichotomized into two groups, “agree” and “disagree,” based on a five-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quality indicators of postoperative pain management.


Results: Patients aged ≥ 60 years accounted for 39.3% of the study population. Nearly 50% of participants reported that nurses did not routinely assess pain at least three times per day. In addition, 58.6% of patients indicated that they were not given the opportunity to participate in choosing pain relief methods, and 53.2% reported that they did not receive assistance from nurses in positioning to relieve pain.


Conclusion: Patients showed positive evaluations regarding nursing interventions for pain relief and the ward environment. However, the proportion of patients agreeing with several indicators related to postoperative pain management remained relatively low. Further training is needed to improve nurses’ knowledge and competencies in postoperative pain management.

Article Details

Keywords

Pain management, gastrointestinal surgery, nursing, Vietnam

References

[1] Gilron, I., et al., Current methods and challenges for acute pain clinical trials. Pain reports, 2019. 4(3): p. e647. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000647
[2] Weiser, T.G., et al., Size and distribution of the global volume of surgery in 2012. Bull World Health Organ, 2016. 94(3): p. 201-209f. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.159293
[3] Rawal, N., Current issues in postoperative pain management. European Journal of Anaesthesiology| EJA, 2016. 33(3): p. 160-171. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000366
[4] Gan, T.J., Poorly controlled postoperative pain: prevalence, consequences, and prevention. Journal of pain research, 2017: p. 2287-2298. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144066
[5] Chou, R., et al., Management of Postoperative Pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American pain society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' committee on regional anesthesia, executive committee, and administrative council. The journal of pain, 2016. 17(2): p. 131-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008
[6] Bộ Y tế, Thông tư hướng dẫn công tác gây mê- hồi sức. Thông tư số 12/2012/TT- BYT, ban hành ngày 20 tháng 8 năm 2012, 2012.
[7] Dechasa, A., et al., Post-operative pain management practice and associated factors among nurses working at public hospitals, in Oromia region, Ethiopia. medRxiv, 2022: p. 2022.04. 14.22273889. doi: 10.1101/2022.04.14.22273889
[8] Köse Tamer, L. and G. Sucu Dağ, The assessment of pain and the quality of postoperative pain management in surgical patients. Sage Open, 2020. 10(2): p. 2158244020924377. doi: 10.1177/2158244020924377
[9] Beck CT, P.D., Owen SV Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2007. 30(4): p. 459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199
[10] Taber, K., The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 2018. 48: p. 1-24. doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
[11] Idvall, E., E. Hamrin, and M. Unosson, Development of an instrument to measure strategic and clinical quality indicators in postoperative pain management. Journal of advanced nursing, 2002. 37(6): p. 532-540. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02126.x
[12] Asna Zehra Naqvi, Umair Hassan, Wasif Raza, et al.
Assessing the characteristics of postoperative pain and its quality of management among patients underwent surgery: A cross-sectional study from North Wales, UK. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2023;15(8):502–509.
[13] Juszczak, K., K. Jaracz, and I. Kuberka, Subjective assessment of the quality of nursing care in terms of postoperative pain in patients undergoing surgical intervention. Pielęgniarstwo Chirurgiczne i Angiologiczne/Surgical and Vascular Nursing, 2016. 10(4): p. 127-130.