Bài báo khoa học Tập 66 Số Vol 67. English Version No 2 11/06/2026

EVALUATING THE RESULTS OF PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER TECHNIQUE AND RELATED FACTORS IN NEONATES AT PHU THO PROVINCIAL OBSTETRICS AND PEDIATRICS HOSPITAL

Nguyen Duc Hau1, Nguyen Thi Nga2, Tuong Thu Huyen1, Nguyen Trang Mo1
1 Phu Tho provincial Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital
2 Saint Paul General Hospital
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v66i8.4068
18 Lượt xem
5 Lượt tải xuống
Tóm tắt

Objective: To evaluate the results of peripherally inserted central catheter technique and describe factors related to the results of insertion and maintenance of peripherally inserted central catheter in neonates at Phu Tho provincial Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital in 2025.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study analyzed over 120 cases of peripherally inserted central catheter in 116 neonates from January 2024 to September 2025.

Results: The majority of peripherally inserted central catheter placements were successful (96.7% after intervention). 80.8% of catheters were in the correct central position immediately after insertion. The average duration of catheter maintenance was 18.1-19.35 days. The rate of central line-associated bloodstream infection was significantly higher in neonates with lower gestational age (p = 0.026) and lower birth weight (p = 0.021). Non-central tip position increased the risk of infection by 3.9 times compared to central position (p = 0.017).

Conclusion: Peripherally inserted central catheter is a highly effective technique for long-term infusion in neonates. Low birth weight, low gestational age, and non-central catheter tip position are significant risk factors for complications, especially central line-associated bloodstream infection.

Tài liệu tham khảo
[1]
Janes M, Kalyn A, Pinelli J et al. A randomized trial comparing peripherally inserted central venous catheters and peripheral intravenous catheters in very low birth weight infants. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 2000, 35 (7): 1040-1044. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.7767. Google Scholar
[2]
Chait P.G, Ingram J, Phillips-Gordon C et al. Peripherally inserted central catheters in children. Radiology, 1995, 197 (3): 775-778. doi: 10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480755. Google Scholar
[3]
Seckold T, Walker S, Dwyer T. A comparison of silicone and polyurethane PICC lines and post-insertion complication rates: A systematic review. Journal of Vascular Access, 2015, 16 (3): 167-177. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000336. Google Scholar
[4]
Khalid F, Douglas J, Wayne A et al. Variations in nosocomial infection rates in Canadian neonatal intensive care units may be practice-related. BMC Pediatrics, 2005, 5: 22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-5-22. Google Scholar
[5]
Sengupta A, Lehmann C, Diener-West M, Perl T.M, Milstone A.M. Catheter duration and risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection in neonates with PICCs. Pediatrics, 2010, 125 (4): 648-653. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2559. Google Scholar
[6]
Yu X, Yue S, Wang M et al. Risk factors related to non-elective removal of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates. BioMed Research International, 2018, 2018: 3769376. doi: 10.1155/2018/3769376. Google Scholar
[7]
Milstone A.M, Reich N.G, Advani S et al. Catheter dwell time and central line-associated bloodstream infection in neonates with PICCs: A multicenter cohort study. Pediatrics, 2013, 132 (6): e1609-e1615. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1645. Google Scholar