Bài báo khoa học Tập 66 Số Vol 67. English Version No 2 11/06/2026

THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY OF NANO BERBERINE GEL VERSUS 1% SILVER SULFADIAZINE IN PEDIATRIC THERMAL BURN INJURIES

Le Quoc Chieu1, Nguyen Ngoc Tuan1, Chu Anh Tuan2, Ho Thi Van Anh1
1 Le Huu Trac National Burn Hospital, Military Medical Academy
2 Le Huu Trac National Burn Hospital, Military Medical AcademyLe Huu Trac National Burn Hospital, Military Medical Academy
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v66i8.4057
16 Lượt xem
5 Lượt tải xuống
Tóm tắt

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy, bacterial control ability, and the molecular mechanisms underlying the wound healing effects of Berberin nano gel compared with Silver Sulfadiazine 1% cream (SSD 1%) on superficial thermal burns in pediatric patients.

Methods: A prospective, controlled, within-patient (split-wound) study in 34 children with II-III degree burns treated at Le Huu Trac National Burn Hospital. Each child had two damaged zones that were equivalent: Zone A was treated with Berberine nano gel, and Zone B was treated with SSD 1%. Evaluation of complete healing time, time to 50% epithelialization, surface bacterial load (D0, D7, D14), and CHEOPS pain score.

Results: Time to complete healing was shortened with Berberine nano gel: superficial second-degree 8.26 ± 2.45 days vs. 9.71 ± 2.95 days; third-degree 14.85 ± 5.20 days vs. 18.41 ± 6.56 days (p <0.05). The bacterial load was reduced in both zones over time. At D7, it was significantly lower in the Berberine nano gel group (43.22 ± 37.28 vs. 92.59 ± 81.14 CFU units; p <0.05), whereas at D14 the difference was not significant. The drug was well tolerated, with a mean CHEOPS of 1.56 ± 1.56.

Conclusion: Berberine nano gel shortens wound healing time, improves early bacterial control, and is a potential alternative to 1% SSD for the treatment of superficial burns in children.

Tài liệu tham khảo
[1]
WHO (2023), Burns (Fact sheet). Google Scholar
[2]
George Kallstrom (2014), "Are quantitative bacterial wound cultures useful?", Journal of clinical microbiology, 52(8), tr. 2753-2756. Google Scholar
[3]
Alex Bezerra da Silva Maciel và các cộng sự (2019), "Tissue healing efficacy in burn patients treated with 1% silver sulfadiazine versus other treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", Anais brasileiros de dermatologia, 94(2), tr. 204-210. Google Scholar
[4]
Nguyễn Ngọc Tuấn, Lê Quốc Chiểu và Ngô Ngọc Hà (2022), "Nghiên cứu tác dụng điều trị vết thương thực nghiệm của gel nano Berberin trên lâm sàng", Tạp chí Y học Thảm hoạ và Bỏng, 3, tr. 22-36. Google Scholar
[5]
Marja N Storm‐Versloot và các cộng sự (2010), "Topical silver for preventing wound infection", Cochrane database of systematic reviews(3). Google Scholar
[6]
Jason S Lanham và các cộng sự (2020), "Outpatient burn care: prevention and treatment", American family physician, 101(8), tr. 463-470. Google Scholar
[7]
Terry Swanson và các cộng sự (2022), "IWII Wound Infection in Clinical Practice consensus document: 2022 update", Journal of wound care, 31(Sup12), tr. S10-S21. Google Scholar
[8]
Md Habban Akhter và các cộng sự (2023), "Enhanced drug delivery and wound healing potential of berberine-loaded chitosan–alginate nanocomposite gel: characterization and in vivo assessment", Frontiers in Public Health, 11, tr. 1238961. Google Scholar
[9]
Sipan Li và các cộng sự (2023), "In situ gelling hydrogel loaded with berberine liposome for the treatment of biofilm-infected wounds", Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 11, tr. 1189010. Google Scholar