Articles Vol. 65 No. CĐ 1 - Liên chi hội Phẫu thuật bàn tay 12/03/2024

28. MRSA INCIDENCE AND ANTIBIOTIC TRENDS IN HAND INFECTIONS: A 05-YEAR LONGITUDINAL STUDY IN HOSPITAL FOR TRAUMA AND ORTHOPEADIC

Huynh Thi Linh Thu1,2, Nguyen The Tuan1,2, Phan Anh Tuan1,2, Vu Huy Thanh1,2
1 Hospital for Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ho Chi Minh city
2 Bệnh viện Chấn thương Chỉnh hình TP.HCM
Corresponding author: drtuan3009@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v65iCD1.989
21 Views
9 Downloads
Abstract

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is the most reported pathogen in hand infections at medical centers throughout the world. Antibiotic sensitivity trends are not well known. The purposes of this study were to examine and determine the drug resistance trends for MRSA infections of the hand and to provide recommendations for empiric antibiotic treatment based on sensitivity profiles

Objectives: A 05-year longitudinal, retrospective review was performed on all culture-positive hand infections encountered in HTO from 2019 to 2023. The proportions of all organisms were calculated for each year and collectively. MRSA infections were additionally subanalyzed for antibiotic sensitivity

Results: A total of 369 culture-positive hand infections were identified. Overall, MRSA grew on culture in 38% of cases. A trend toward decreasing annual MRSA incidence was noted over the 05-year study period. There was a steady increase in polymicrobial infections during the same time. Resistance to clindamycin increased steadily during the 05-year study, starting at 53.85% in 2021 but growing to 78.26% by 2023. Similarly, levofloxacin resistance consistently increased throughout the study, reaching its peak at 60.71% in 2019 ; however, decreasing at 29.17% in 2023

Conclusions: The annual incidence of MRSA in hand infections remains the most common pathogen. There has been an alternative increase in the number of polymicrobial infections. MRSA resistance to clindamycin and levofloxacin consistently increased during the study period. Empiric antibiotic therapy for hand infections should not only avoid penicillin and other beta-lactams but should also consider avoiding clindamycin and levofloxacin for empiric treatment.

References
[1]
Ong YS, Levin LS, Hand infections; Google Scholar
[2]
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Oct Google Scholar
[3]
;124(4):225e-233e. doi:10.1097/ Google Scholar
[4]
PRS.0b013e3181b458c9 Google Scholar
[5]
Bach HG, Steffin B, Chhadia AM et al., Google Scholar
[6]
Community-associated methicillin-resistant Google Scholar
[7]
Staphylococcus aureus hand infections in an Google Scholar
[8]
urban setting. The Journal of hand surgery. Google Scholar
[9]
Mar 2007;32(3):380-3. doi:10.1016/j. Google Scholar
[10]
jhsa.2007.01.006 Google Scholar
[11]
Fowler JR, Ilyas AM, Epidemiology of adult acute Google Scholar
[12]
hand infections at an urban medical center. The Google Scholar
[13]
Journal of hand surgery. Jun 2013;38(6):1189- Google Scholar
[14]
doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.03.013 Google Scholar
[15]
Houshian S, Seyedipour S, Wedderkopp N, Google Scholar
[16]
Epidemiology of bacterial hand infections. Google Scholar
[17]
International journal of infectious diseases: IJID: Google Scholar
[18]
official publication of the International Society Google Scholar
[19]
for Infectious Diseases. Jul 2006;10(4):315-9. Google Scholar
[20]
doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2005.06.009 Google Scholar
[21]
Kowalski TJ, Thompson LA, Gundrum Google Scholar
[22]
JD, Antimicrobial management of septic Google Scholar
[23]
arthritis of the hand and wrist. Infection. Apr Google Scholar
[24]
;42(2):379-84. doi:10.1007/s15010-013- Google Scholar
[26]
O’Malley M, Fowler J, Ilyas AM, Communityacquired Google Scholar
[27]
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Google Scholar
[28]
aureus infections of the hand: prevalence and Google Scholar
[29]
timeliness of treatment. The Journal of hand Google Scholar
[30]
surgery; Mar 2009;34(3):504-8. doi:10.1016/j. Google Scholar
[31]
jhsa.2008.11.021 Google Scholar
[32]
Osterman M, Draeger R, Stern P, Acute hand Google Scholar
[33]
infections. The Journal of hand surgery; Aug Google Scholar
[34]
;39(8):1628-35; quiz 1635. doi:10.1016/j. Google Scholar
[35]
jhsa.2014.03.031 Google Scholar
[36]
Tosti R, Samuelsen BT, Bender S et al.,230 Google Scholar
[37]
Emerging multidrug resistance of methicillinresistant Google Scholar
[38]
Staphylococcus aureus in hand Google Scholar
[39]
infections. The Journal of bone and joint surgery Google Scholar
[40]
American volume; Sep 17 2014;96(18):1535-40. Google Scholar
[41]
doi:10.2106/jbjs.M.01159 Google Scholar
[42]
Tosti R, Trionfo A, Gaughan J et al., Risk Google Scholar
[43]
factors associated with clindamycin-resistant, Google Scholar
[44]
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Google Scholar
[45]
in hand abscesses. The Journal of hand Google Scholar
[46]
surgery; Apr 2015;40(4):673-6. doi:10.1016/j. Google Scholar
[47]
jhsa.2014.12.044 Google Scholar
[48]
Fowler JR, Greenhill D, Schaffer AA et al., Google Scholar
[49]
Evolving incidence of MRSA in urban hand Google Scholar
[50]
infections. Orthopedics; Jun 2013;36(6):796- Google Scholar
[51]
doi:10.3928/01477447-20130523-27 Google Scholar
[52]
Lodise TP, McKinnon PS, Burden of Google Scholar
[53]
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Google Scholar
[54]
focus on clinical and economic outcomes. Google Scholar
[55]
Pharmacotherapy; Jul 2007;27(7):1001-12. Google Scholar
[56]
doi:10.1592/phco.27.7.1001 Google Scholar
[57]
Shorr AF, Epidemiology and economic Google Scholar
[58]
impact of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus Google Scholar
[59]
aureus: review and analysis of the literature. Google Scholar
[60]
PharmacoEconomics; 2007;25(9):751-68. Google Scholar
[61]
doi:10.2165/00019053-200725090-00004 Google Scholar
[62]
Gorwitz RJ, Jernigan DB, Jernigan JA, Google Scholar
[63]
Strategies for clinical management of MRSA in Google Scholar
[64]
the community; summary of an experts’ meeting Google Scholar
[65]
convened by the Centers for Disease Control and Google Scholar
[66]
Prevention, 2006. Google Scholar
[67]
Wilson PC, Rinker B, The incidence of Google Scholar
[68]
methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus in Google Scholar
[69]
community-acquired hand infections. Annals Google Scholar
[70]
of plastic surgery; May 2009;62(5):513-6. Google Scholar
[71]
doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31818a6665 Google Scholar
[72]
Gorwitz RJ, A review of community-associated Google Scholar
[73]
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Google Scholar
[74]
skin and soft tissue infections. The Pediatric Google Scholar
[75]
infectious disease journal; Jan 2008;27(1):1-7. Google Scholar
[76]
doi:10.1097/INF.0b013e31815819bb Google Scholar
[77]
Rodvold KA, McConeghy KW, Methicillinresistant Google Scholar
[78]
Staphylococcus aureus therapy: past, Google Scholar
[79]
present, and future. Clinical infectious diseases : Google Scholar
[80]
an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Google Scholar
[81]
Society of America; Jan 2014;58 Suppl 1:S20-7. Google Scholar
[82]
doi:10.1093/cid/cit614 Google Scholar
[83]
MacDougall C, Powell JP, Johnson CK et al., Google Scholar
[84]
Hospital and community fluoroquinolone use Google Scholar
[85]
and resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Google Scholar
[86]
Escherichia coli in 17 US hospitals. Clinical Google Scholar
[87]
infectious diseases : an official publication of the Google Scholar
[88]
Infectious Diseases Society of America; Aug 15 Google Scholar
[89]
;41(4):435-40. doi:10.1086/432056 Google Scholar