Articles Vol. 65 No. CĐ 1 - Liên chi hội Phẫu thuật bàn tay 12/03/2024

17. SURVEY CAREGIVERS' OPINIONS ON THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE APHASIA UNITED BEST PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS IN VIETNAM

Pham Dinh Ngan Thanh1,2, Pham Le An1,2, Sarah J Wallace3,4, Tran Nguyen Binh Minh Hoang5,6
1 University of Medicine & Pharmacy HCMC
2 Đại học Y Dược Tp. HCM
3 The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
4 Đại học Queensland, Brisbane, Úc
5 HCMC Hospital for Rehabilitation and Professional Diseases
6 Bệnh viện Phục hồi chức năng - Điều trị bệnh nghề nghiệp
Corresponding author: thanhpham@ump.edu.vn
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v65iCD1.977
20 Views
8 Downloads
Keywords
Aphasia, Caregivers, Practice recommendation, Speech and Language Therapy, Stroke, Nominal group technique.
Abstract

Aphasia affects the quality of life of patients and their caregivers.

Objective: To determine (1) the appropriateness of the content of the best practice recommendations (PR) for aphasia of Aphasia United from the caregivers’ perspective in Vietnam; and (2) PRs that need to be supplemented in accordance with reality in Vietnam.

Method: Quantitative combined qualitative method using nominal group technique and maximum variation sampling.

Results: Seventeen caregivers for post-stroke aphasia patients participated in one of six nominal groups. Most of the existing PRs have a high agreement rate (88.24 – 100%). Priority PRs for supplementation are compiled into five themes and ordered by relative importance. The top priority recommendation is “People with aphasia and caregivers should receive psychological support” (42.16%); next is “People with aphasia should have easy access to Speech and Language Therapy” (34.31%).

Conclusion: Existing recommendations are appropriate to the needs of people with aphasia and related people in the Vietnamese context from the caregiver’s perspective. Besides, additional recommendations contribute to improving service quality for aphasia.

References
[1]
Papathanasiou I, Coppens P, Aphasia and related Google Scholar
[2]
neurogenic communication disorders: basic Google Scholar
[3]
concepts, management, and efficacy. Burlington, Google Scholar
[4]
MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2017. Google Scholar
[5]
Simmons-Mackie N, Worrall L et al., The top Google Scholar
[6]
ten: best practice recommendations for aphasia. Google Scholar
[7]
Aphasiology. 2016; 31:1-21. Google Scholar
[8]
Aphasia United, Khuyến nghị thực hành tốt nhất Google Scholar
[9]
cho Mất ngôn ngữ 2014, www.aphasiatrials. Google Scholar
[10]
org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/AphasiaUnited- Google Scholar
[11]
BPR-Vietnamese.pdf. Ngày truy cập lại: Google Scholar
[12]
/10/2023 Google Scholar
[13]
Bộ Y tế, Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán, điều trị phục hồi Google Scholar
[14]
chức năng cho người bệnh đột quỵ (Quyết định Google Scholar
[15]
số 2536/QĐ-BYT ngày 16 tháng 06 năm 2020). Google Scholar
[16]
Hà Nội, 2020. Google Scholar
[17]
Wallace SJ, Worrall L et al., Which outcomes Google Scholar
[18]
are most important to people with aphasia and Google Scholar
[19]
their families? An international nominal group Google Scholar
[20]
technique study framed within the ICF. Disability Google Scholar
[21]
Rehabilitation. 2017; 39(14):1364-79.144 Google Scholar
[22]
Elo S, Kyngäs H, The qualitative content Google Scholar
[23]
analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing. Google Scholar
[24]
; 62(1):107-15. Google Scholar
[25]
McMillan SS, Kelly F et al., Using the Nominal Google Scholar
[26]
Group Technique: how to analyse across multiple Google Scholar
[27]
groups. Health Services and Outcomes Research Google Scholar
[28]
Methodology. 2014; 14(3):92-108. Google Scholar
[29]
United States Agency for International Google Scholar
[30]
Development, Đánh giá tính sẵn có dịch vụ âm Google Scholar
[31]
ngữ và ngôn ngữ trị liệu tại Việt Nam 29/08/2016 Google Scholar
[32]
– 30/09/2016, 2016. Google Scholar
[33]
Nguyen HT, Gall S et al., Processes of Stroke Google Scholar
[34]
Unit Care and Outcomes at Discharge in Google Scholar
[35]
Vietnam: Findings from the Registry of Stroke Google Scholar
[36]
Care Quality (RES-Q) in a Major Public Hospital. Google Scholar
[37]
Journal of Stroke Medicine. 2019; 2(2):119-27. Google Scholar
[38]
Brady MC, Kelly H et al., Speech and Google Scholar
[39]
language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Google Scholar
[40]
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, Google Scholar
[41]
; 6. Google Scholar